传统集成与近代滥觞:阮元方志学思想析论  

The Epitomising of Older Traditions and a New Departure for Modern Historiography: Ruan Yuan's Thought of Local Histories

作　　者：屈宁[1] 徐成[1] QU Ning XU Cheng(The School of History and Culture/Advanced Institute of Confucian Studies, Shandong University, Ji＇ nan 250100, Shandong)

机构地区：[1]山东大学历史文化学院/儒学高等研究院,山东济南250100

出　　处：《陕西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2016年第5期81-88,共8页Journal of Shaanxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重点项目"中国历史编纂学的演进路径;优良传统和当代价值研究"(09AZS001);国家社会科学基金青年项目"阮元史学新探"(16CZS001);山东大学自主创新基金青年团队项目"中国古代王朝盛衰规律综合研究"(IFYT1206)

摘　　要：嘉道之际,方志编纂呈现出普遍重视历史沿革与文献源流的重要趋向。作为这一思想的主要倡导者,阮元兼采众说,提出"山经、地志,史家之书""人事与地理相经纬"等重要观点,这既是其不囿于学术门户,"汇汉、宋之全"的治学旨趣的体现,也是时代剧变下学风明显转捩的缩影。其所主修的《广东通志》《云南通志稿》等书,既有鲜明的个人学术风格,又有突出的时代特点,既集传统方志学思想之大成,又启近代方志学之滥觞。The writing of local histories presented,during the reigns of Emperor Daoguang and Emperor Jiaqing,a general trend of emphasizing the change and continuity of literature and historical facts. As a major initiator of this trend,Ruan Yuan stated that the records of mountains and localities should be incorporated in historians＇ work and called for the attention to ‘the interaction between the affairs of men（ mainly local governing） and local geography＇. Such appeals manifest both his conception of ‘fusing the scholarship of Han and Song＇and the turning of contemporary scholarly interests. Guangdong Tongzhi and Yunnan Tongzhi Gao,both his major works,epitomised both Ruan Yuan＇s scholarly interest and contemporary historiographical trends;they incorporated the essence of traditional local historiography and marked a new departure for the writing of local histories in a modern sense.

关 键 词：阮元 章学诚 方志学 《广东通志》 历史编纂学 

分 类 号：K249[历史地理—历史学] K290[历史地理—中国史]