检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]沈阳市第五人民医院肿瘤外一科,110023 [2]辽宁中医药大学附属第三医院麻醉科
出 处:《中国现代药物应用》2016年第19期25-26,共2页Chinese Journal of Modern Drug Application
摘 要:目的比较胰腺癌标准根治术与胰腺癌扩大根治术的治疗效果。方法 40例胰腺癌患者,随机分为试验组和对照组,各20例。对照组采用标准胰腺癌根治术,试验组在对照组基础上采用胰腺癌扩大根治术。观察两组患者的临床疗效。结果试验组术后1、3年生存率(80%、40%)高于对照组(50%、10%),差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组并发症发生率(35%、40%)比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论胰腺癌扩大根治术效果优于标准根治术,疗效肯定。Objective To compare curative effects between standard and extended radical surgery for pancreatic cancer. Methods A total of 40 patients with pancreatic cancer were randomly divided into experimental group and control group, with 20 cases in each group. The control group received standard radical surgery for pancreatic cancer, and the experimental group received additional extended radical surgery for pancreatic cancer. Clinical effects of the two groups were observed. Results The experimental group had higher survival rates in postoperative1 and 3 years(80%, 40%) than the control group(50%, 10%), and the difference had statistical significance(P〈0.05). There was no statistically significant difference of incidence of complications(35% and 40%) between the two groups(P〉0.05). Conclusion Extended radical surgery for pancreatic cancer provides better effect than standard radical surgery, along with definite curative effect.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.222.174.73