检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]山西医科大学人文社会科学学院,太原030001 [2]山西医科大学医学心理学教研室,太原030001
出 处:《中华行为医学与脑科学杂志》2016年第9期838-841,共4页Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science
基 金:山西省高等学校人文社会科学重点研究基地项目(2014320);山西省教育科学规划课题(GH-13023)
摘 要:目的探讨心理急救培训对医学生关于突发事件认知评价的影响。方法招募某医科大学在读本科生作为研究对象,分为培训组(n=42)和对照组(n=53),培训组接受20学时的短期针对性心理急救培训,对照组为空白对照。培训前后采用应激评价量表(SAM)和隐性不适应风格量表(LMSQ)进行施测。结果培训前后,培训组医学生在SAM的威胁性因子[(11.95±3.17)分vs(10.45±2.48)分,t=2.426,P=0.020]、挑战性因子[(12.64±2.84)分vs(14.40±1.95)分,t=-3.304,Jp=0.002]、自控性因子[(13.05±3.15)分vs(14.93±2.00)分,t=-3.240,P=0.002]、他控性因子[(12.40±3.10)分vs(14.52±2.52)分,t=-3.553,P=0.001]和应激性因子[(13.26±2.69)分vs(12.00±1.96)分,t=2.592,P=0.013]上,以及在LMSQ的躯体性威胁因子[(23.88±7.59)分vs(19.76±4.82)分,t=3.057,P=0.004]上的差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05),其余因子培训前后差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);两组培训前后差值比较显示,培训组SAM的挑战性因子(t=-2.466,P=0.016)、自控性因子(t=-2.557,P=0.012)、他控性因子(t=-2.800,P=0.006)得分的提升幅度及LMSQ的躯体性威胁因子(t=-2.308,P=0.023)得分的下降幅度显著大于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论短期针对性心理急救培训在改变医学生对突发事件的认知评价上具有一定的作用。Objective To explore the influence of psychological first aid training on cognitive appraisal of sudden events in medical students. Methods A medical university undergraduate students were selected and divided into the training group( n= 42) and the control group( n= 53). The former was treated with 20 hours short-term targeted psychological first aid, and the latter was treated as blank control. The SAM and LMSQ were adopted to measure students' cognitive appraisal before and 'after the training. Results After the training,the training group gained significant differences(P〈0.05) in threat ( 11.95± 3.17) vs (10.45±2.48) ( t=2.426, P=0.020) ,challenge (12.64±2.84) vs (14.40±1.95) ( t=-3.304, P= 0.002) ,controllable-by-self (13.05±3.15) vs (14.93±2.00) ( t=-3.240, P= 0.002) ,controllable-by-others (12.40±3.10) vs (14.52±2.52) ( t=-3.553, P=0.001) ,stressfulness (13.26-±2.69) vs (12.00±1.96) ( t= 2.592, P=0.013) of SAM,and Physical threat ((23.88±7.59) vs ( 19.76±4.82), t= 3.057, P= 0.004) of LMSQ compared with before training. Other factors had no significant difference (P〉0.05). Compared with two groups,the training group gained significant increase(P〈0.05) on the score differences for SAM factors ( challenge ( t= -2.466, P= 0.016), controllable-by-self ( t= -2.557, P= 0.012), controllable-by-others ( t= -2.800, P= 0.006)) than the control group, and significant reduction (P〈0.05) in physical threat ( t=-2.308, P=0.023) of LMSQ. Conclusion Short-term targeted psychological first aid training has certain effects on changing cognitive appraisal about sudden events for medical students.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28