20世纪西方文论阐释中国问题的三种范式  

Three Models of Explaining China's Problems by the Western Literary Theory in the 20th Century

作　　者：曾军[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海大学文学院

出　　处：《学术研究》2016年第10期1-9,共9页Academic Research

基　　金：国家社科基金重点项目"欧美左翼文论中的中国问题"(15AZW001)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：开展20世纪西方文论对中国问题阐释的研究,既有助于中国学者在西方学术体系内部展开对西方文论的批判性反思,也有助于借它山之石推进当代中国文论话语体系的建设。对西方文论而言,中国问题是作为外部的、可供选择的他者而存在的;但对于中国学者而言,西方文论对中国问题的理解和阐释则包含着多个层面的复杂情感结构。20世纪西方文论阐释中国问题有三种范式:作为"异国情调"的中国问题,成为"东方主义"的中国问题,谋求"多元共生"的中国问题。其中,多元共生正在成为越来越多的学者日渐明晰的学术立场和态度。当代中国文论不能仅仅满足于提供给西方学者以异国情调猎奇感的古代美学和思想,也不能停留在对西方文论曲解和误读中国问题的东方主义的批判上,更重要的是在多元共生的文化理想中,在交往对话和思想碰撞中建构当代中国文论话语体系的新形态。In the 20 th century, the Western literary theory's interpretation of China's problems is a criticism of the western literary theory in the inner discourse system of the western literary theory itself. In the case, the China's problems were taken as outer and optional existence as an other; while Chinese scholars tended to think that the western literary theory contained several levels of complicated feeling structure in comprehending and interpreting those Chinese problems. There were three models in the western literary theory's interpreting Chinese problems in the 20 th century, i.e. the Chinese problems as a foreign emotional appeal, the Chinese problems become Orientalism, and the Chinese problems caused for multiple-lateral para-genesis. Especially,the last one is being accepted by more and more scholars as a clear academic standpoint and attitude.However, the current China's literary theory should not be satisfi ed for just offering the western scholars with a classical aesthetics and thoughts of foreign emotional appeal, nor should stay in the Orientalist criticism of misinterpreting the western literary theory and misunderstanding the Chinese problems. It is more important to construct a new-state discourse system of Chinese literary theory through communications and conversations with a cultural ideal of multiple-lateral para-genesis.

关 键 词：20 世纪西方文论 中国问题 异国情调 东方主义 多元共生 

分 类 号：I02[文学—文学理论]