检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张权[1] 王敬慧[1] 李曦[1] 张卉[1] 农靖颖[1] 秦娜[1] 张新勇[1] 吴羽华[1] 杨新杰[1] 吕嘉林[1] 张树才[1]
机构地区:[1]首都医科大学附属北京胸科医院/北京市结核病胸部肿瘤研究所肿瘤内科,北京101149
出 处:《结核病与胸部肿瘤》2016年第3期173-178,共6页Tuberculosis and Thoracic Tumor
摘 要:背景与目的鼠类肉瘤病毒癌基因(Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene, KRAS )是非小细胞肺癌(non-small cell lung cancer,NSCLC)的重要驱动基因之一,研究显示KRAS是表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors, EGFR-TKIs)药物的耐药标志,但其对于化疗敏感性及预后方面的意义存在争议。本研究旨在积累KRAS突变阳性的NSCLC患者治疗经验。方法我们回顾性分析了107例KRAS突变阳性的NSCLC患者的临床资料,分析KRAS突变阳性的NSCLC患者一线化疗疗效以及靶向治疗疗效。结果52例接受一线化疗的晚期KRAS突变阳性NSCLC患者客观缓解率(objective response rate,ORR)为9.6%,疾病控制率(disease control rate,DCR)为53.8%,中位疾病无进展生存期(progression-free survival,PFS)为3个月;21例接受EGFR-TKIs药物治疗的KRAS突变阳性NSCLC患者ORR为9.5%,DCR为23.8%,PFS为1个月,其中EGFR/KRAS共突变患者接受EGFR-TKIs治疗的ORR及DCR均要显著高于单纯KRAS突变人群(50%vs0,P=0.029;75%vs11.8%,P=0.043),EGFR/KRAS共突变患者接受EGFR—TKIs治疗的PFS较单纯KRAS突变患者延长,可见统计学差异(3个月vs1个月,P=0.004)。结论KRAS突变阳性NSCLC患者化疗有效率低,缓解时间短,EGFR—TKIs治疗效果差,亟需研发新的药物;EGFR/KRAS共突变现象客观存在,EGFR-TKIs药物可作为这类患者有效的治疗选择之一。Background and objective Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene (K/L/S) mutation is one of the major driver genes of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). KRAS is a resistant predictor of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), which raises controversy because of its role in chemotherapy sensitivity and prognosis. The aim of this study is to accumulate clinical experience in treating NSCLC patients harboring KRAS mutation. Methods A total of 107 NSCLC patients harboring KRAS mutation were analyzed retrospectively. The efficacy was analyzed in terms of first-line chemotherapy or EGFR-TKIs therapy. Results The objective response rate (ORR) to first-line chemotherapy of 52 patients with advanced disease harboring KRAS mutation was 9.6%. The disease control rate (DCR) was 53.8%, and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3 months, The ORR to EGFR-TKIs therapy in 21 patients harboring KRAS mutation and EGFR/KRAS co-mutation was 9.5%; the DCR was 23.8%, and the median PFS was 1 month. The ORR and DCR to EGFRTKIs therapy of patients with EGFR/KRAS co-mutatiun were significantly higher than those of patients with KRAS mutation (50% vs 0, P=0.029; 75% vs 11.8%, P=0.043); the median PFS was also significantly longer (3 months vs 1 month, P=0.004). Conclusion The efficacy to first-line chemotherapy and EGFR-TKIs therapy in NSCLC patients harboring KRAS mutation was poor; thus, new drugs should be developed. Furthermore, the existence of EGFR/KRAS co-mutation was confirmed. Hence, EGFR-TKIs therapy should be administered to patients with EGFR/KRAS co-mutation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.191.24.197