我国刑事诉讼电子证据规则的问题与完善路径  

The Existing Problems and Improving Path of Rules of Electronic Evidence in Criminal Litigation in China

作　　者：陈鹏飞[1] Chen Pengfei

机构地区：[1]重庆市北碚区人民检察院,重庆400711

出　　处：《行政与法》2016年第10期122-128,F0003,共8页Administration and Law

摘　　要：电子证据作为新型法定证据种类,具有虚拟性、稳定性、多样性和动态性的特征,区别于传统证据。由于理论和经验上的不足,我国刑事诉讼电子证据规则的立法规定还比较粗略,且不成系统。在刑事诉讼实务中也面临着取证程序、证明力和非法证据排除等方面的问题。因此,规范我国刑事诉讼电子证据规则,应从取证程序的规范化、人员和装备的专业化完善电子证据的取证规则;从原始介质、保管链条等方面完善证明力规则;从取证主体、程序、权益保障等方面完善电子证据排除规则。As a new legitimate evidence,electronic evidence is typical of virtual,stable,varied and dynamic,which differentiates between the traditional evidence.Because of the insufficiency of theory and experience,the electronic evidence rule is not systemic in criminal litigation.And there are also some issues in the investigation procedure,probative force and illegally evidence exclusion procedure.To optimize the electronic evidence rules,we should effort from the aspects such as legitimate investigation procedure,professional investigators and equipment,original medium, keeping chain,investigation subject and rights protection.

关 键 词：刑事诉讼 电子证据 完善路径 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]