检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王雪 苏少杰 沈特立 WANG Xue SU Shao-jie SHEN Te-li(Shanghai Electric Power Hospital ,Shanghai 200050,Chin)
机构地区:[1]上海电力医院,上海200050
出 处:《上海针灸杂志》2016年第10期1194-1196,共3页Shanghai Journal of Acupuncture and Moxibustion
基 金:国家中医药管理局东贵荣全国名老中医药专家传承工作室;上海市长宁区卫生和计划生育委员会科研课题(20134ZY20001)
摘 要:目的观察运用针刺补泻手法治疗周围性面瘫的临床疗效。方法将70例面瘫患者随机分为两组,选穴后施行针刺补泻手法和常规针刺法对照治疗,比较针刺治疗前和治疗后即刻、治疗30 d后、治疗3个月后、治疗6个月后House-Brackmann(H-B)面神经功能评分及观察两组治疗6个月后的临床疗效。结果手法组H-B评分优于常规组(P<0.05),两组疗效比较,手法组疗效优于常规组(P<0.05)。结论运用针刺补泻手法治疗周围性面瘫在疗效方面优于单纯常规针刺法治疗。Objective To observe the clinical efficacy of reinforcing-reducing needling methods in treating peripheral facial paralysis.Method Seventy facial paralysis patients were randomized into two groups to compare the reinforcing-reducing needling methods and conventional acupuncture.The House-Brackmann(H-B) scale was observed and compared prior to the treatment,right after the treatment,and respectively after 30-day,3-month,and 6-month treatments,and the clinical efficacy was evaluated after 6-month treatments.Result The H-B score of the reinforcing-reducing manipulation group was superior to that of the conventional group(P〈0.05),and the therapeutic efficacy of the manipulation group was more significant than that of the conventional group(P〈0.05).Conclusion The reinforcing-reducing needling methods can produce a better therapeutic efficacy in treating peripheral facial paralysis compared to conventional acupuncture.
关 键 词:面神经麻痹 针刺 针刺补泻 H-B面神经功能评分
分 类 号:R246.6[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.62