超声震荡联合调磨法清洁戴用后活动修复体的效果分析  

Discussion on the efficacy of ultrasonic concussion combined with grinding method for clinical clean of worn removable prosthesis

作　　者：孙文秀[1] 柳玉晓[2] 

机构地区：[1]济南市天桥区疾病预防控制中心,山东济南250031 [2]济南军区总医院口腔科

出　　处：《实用医药杂志》2016年第10期883-885,共3页Practical Journal of Medicine & Pharmacy

摘　　要：目的探讨超声震荡清洁戴用后活动修复体的效果。方法选取自2012年5月—2015年10月笔者所在医院就诊活动修复体修复后2年复诊患者60例90只义齿,随机分为A、B、C三组,每组30只,A组采用超声震荡法,B组采用传统调磨法,C组采用超声震荡联合调磨法清除污垢。通过细菌培养,比较各种方法对细菌的影响;由同一有经验医师打分,比较清洁情况。采用SPSS13.0统计分析软件分析结果。结果三种方法均有不同除菌效果,C组优于A,B组,A组与B组无显著性差异(P>0.05)。义齿清洁情况C组优于A,B组,A组优于B组。结论超声震荡结合临床调磨能够快速有效地去除复诊时活动义齿表面污垢,实现快速重衬和修理,能够有效减少患者复诊次数,提高义齿质量。Objective To study the effect of ultrasonic concussion on subsequent visit＇s removable prosthesis. Methods The 90 subsequent visit＇s removable prosthesis of 60 patients （from May 2012 to Oct. 2015yr.） were selected. They were randomly divided into 3 groups：Group A,B,C. Each group bad 30 prosthesis. Group A adopted ultrasonic concussion method,Group B traditional grinding method,Group C ultrasonic concussion combined with grinding method to clean the prosthesis. Authors compared the influence of the above 3 methods on the bacteria by germ culture;Scored the prosthesis by one experienced dentist to evaluate the clean effect. SPSS13.0 was used to take statistic analysis. Results The three methods were all effective to degerming,Group C was better than Group A and B,there is no significant difference between Group A and Group B （P〉0.05）. The clean effect was as below：Group C was better than Group A and B,Group A was better than Group B. Conclusions Compared with alone ultrasonic concussion or traditional grinding method,ultrasonic concussion combined with grinding method is the most effective way to clean the prosthesis.

关 键 词：活动修复体 清洁 超声震荡法 调磨法 

分 类 号：R783.6[医药卫生—口腔医学]