论法院确认仲裁协议效力程序的法律性质——以各地法院33份裁判文书为分析对象  

作　　者：张宝成[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学法学院

出　　处：《北京仲裁》2016年第2期1-16,共16页Beijing Arbitration Quarterly

基　　金：北京仲裁委员会科研基金资助项目

摘　　要：在法院确认仲裁协议效力的案件中，当事人双方存在着重要的程序性权益争议，属于争讼案件。但是考虑到仲裁的效率性要求、自裁管辖权、仲裁案件特殊性等因素，依然需要将这一具有争讼性质的案件进行非讼化处理。但其制度安排与一般的非讼程序在审判组织、证明责任分配等方面应当有所区别。In the people＇s court to confirm the validity of the arbitration agreement cases, both parties exist important procedural dispute over rights and interests, and the substantive rights of the procedural interest and the litigant is closely related to, and should be vested in litigation cases. But taking into account the efficiency requirements of the arbitration, jurisdiction, arbitration cases and other special factors, still need this has the nature of litigation cases non litigation. Therefore, the institutional arrangement and the general non contentious procedure in the trial organization, and other aspects of the allocation of the burden of proof should be different.

关 键 词：确认仲裁协议效力 争讼程序 非讼程序 非讼化 

分 类 号：D925.7[政治法律—诉讼法学]