批评话语分析的客观性与科学性评述  

A Review of the Objectivity and Scientificity of Critical Discourse Analysis

作　　者：郭庆民[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学外国语学院,北京100872

出　　处：《外语与外语教学》2016年第5期69-77,共9页Foreign Languages and Their Teaching

摘　　要：批评话语分析(CDA)经常被指缺乏明晰性、客观性、可靠性和可验证性,这等于否定了其科学性。通过梳理和评述CDA的几个重要理念和主张,本文试图说明:通过遵循一些基本的科学原则和明晰的操作步骤,获得充分的语言数据,并系统地利用多学科的研究成果和证据,我们就能使自己的结论得到交叉检验,使之变得可验证,赋予它们真理价值。这样,我们能大幅度提高CDA的客观性和科学性。Critical Discourse Analysis( CDA) is often criticized for lacking explicitness,objectivity,reliability and verifiability,thus lacking scientificity. By clarifying and reviewing some major concepts and claims of CDA,the present paper tries to argue that,if we followsome basic scientific principles and explicit operational procedures,obtain adequate linguistic data and make systematic use of multidisciplinary achievements and evidence,we can have our conclusions crossexamined to make them verifiable,thus endowing them with truth value. In this way,we can tremendously enhance the objectivity and scientificity of CDA.

关 键 词：批评话语分析 科学原则 明晰的研究步骤 客观性 科学性 

分 类 号：H0[语言文字—语言学]