检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:秦苇[1] 魏亭亭[1] 周海燕[1] 吴霞[1] Zhou Haiyan Wu Xia(Rheumatism and Immunology Department, the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325015, China)
机构地区:[1]温州医科大学附属第一医院风湿免疫科,325015
出 处:《中华现代护理杂志》2016年第13期1893-1895,共3页Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
基 金:浙江省温州市科委立项项目(R20120074)
摘 要:目的:对新入院的实习护生进行职业环境风险行为分析并进行干预研究。方法将258名护生根据初始问卷调查结果随机分为对照组和干预组,对照组采用常规教育措施,干预组采取科室小讲课、个别交流谈话、制定安全预案、案例分析教学、引导护患沟通等针对性干预措施。实习结束后进行二次问卷调查,将两次评分进行比较。结果干预组和对照组干预后较干预前问卷评分均发生显著变化,差异均有统计学意义(P <0.05),干预后,干预组评分高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P <0.01)。结论虽然实习本身可以提高护生对职业风险的认知程度,但积极干预措施可以进一步提升护生对职业风险的认知。Objective To analyse the occupational risks of new practice nursing students and the interventions.Methods The nursing students were randomly divided into control group and intervention group according to the result of the initial questionnaire,the control group was used a routine education measure,and the intervention group used intervention measures,such as small lecture,individual communication,developing safety plans,case analysis teaching and guiding the communication,after internship ends,made a questionnaire again and compared the scorings.Results The second questionnaire scorings of both groups had a significant difference comparing to the initial scorings(P 〈0.05),and there also had a significant difference between the two groups before and after the interventions (P 〈0.01 ).Conclusions Although the internship itself can improve the cognition of nursing students on occupational risks,but positive interventions can further enhance the cognition.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.78