检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:田洪琰 于鹏[1] 袁重阳[1] 张娓 仇越秀 李德慧 梁新杰 王晓燕[1]
机构地区:[1]北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院,牙体牙髓科,口腔数字化医疗技术和材料国家工程实验室,口腔数字医学北京市重点实验室,北京100081 [2]北京安泰生物医用材料有限公司,北京100094
出 处:《北京大学学报(医学版)》2016年第5期889-893,共5页Journal of Peking University:Health Sciences
基 金:北京市科学技术委员会计划项目(Z14110000514016)资助~~
摘 要:目的:比较树脂基覆膜材料和一步法自酸蚀粘接剂对牙根面保护作用的耐久性。方法:制备人离体后牙牙根试样和牙本质盘试样,表面分别使用PRG Barrier Coat(PRG)和一步法自酸蚀粘接剂Clearfil S3Bond(CS3)处理,去离子水中静置24 h备用。对牙根和牙本质盘试样分别进行:(1)水老化及抗酸脱矿实验:人离体牙牙根试样水老化处理14 d后,在脱矿缓冲液(p H 4.5)中脱矿4 d,扫描电子显微镜观察横断面;(2)牙刷磨损实验:对已覆盖PRG和CS3后的人离体后牙牙本质盘表面进行牙刷磨损,表面粗糙度仪测量磨损深度(Ry,μm),One-Way ANVOA法进行统计分析。结果:PRG和CS3覆膜厚度分别为(47.1±27.3)μm和(5.7±2.1)μm,水老化实验后二者覆膜形态无明显改变,下方牙本质无脱矿。PRG和CS3的磨损深度随牙刷磨损次数增加而加深,PRG组磨损深度小于CS3组(P<0.05)。结论:PRG水老化实验后抗酸蚀脱矿作用和CS3相似,耐牙刷磨损性能优于CS3。Objective: To compare the durability of resin-based root-surface coating material and all-inone self-etching adhesive on root surface in vitro. Methods: Human extracted premolars or molars with intact roots were selected. The cementum was removed using a periodontal scaler to expose root dentin.The root surface was coated with an acid-resistant nail varnish,leaving a window of 3 mm × 3 mm on the exposed dentin. The window was covered with either PRG Barrier Coat( PRG) or Clearfil S3Bond( CS3). After water aging for 14 d,specimens were immersed in acid buffer at p H 4. 5 for 4 d and the demineralization buffer was changed every 24 h. Then the specimen was split longitudinally through the center of the ‘window'and the cross-sectional surface was observed with scanning electron microscope( SEM). After fixed and dehydrated,the prepared samples were coated with platinum. The coating material,root dentin and the interface was observed by scanning electron microscope( SEM). The thickness of the coating material was measured on the SEM images. Regarding toothbrush wear test,coronal dentindisks were prepared and covered with PRG and CS3,respectively. After storage in water for 24 h,the specimen was subjected to the toothbrush wear tester for 100,200,300,500,700,1 500 brushing cycles. A slurry of fluoride toothpaste( 1 ∶ 2 ratio of toothpaste and deionized water by weight) was used and the brushing load was 300 N. The surface microstructure of remaining coating material was analyzed using SEM. The wear depths were determined by a profilometer. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 20. 0 by one-way ANOVA. The level of significance was at 0. 05. Results: Application of PRG Barrier Coat produced a coating layer of( 47. 1 ± 27. 3) μm,while CS3 presented a thin film of( 5. 7 ±2. 1) μm in thickness. The exposed dentin was hermetically sealed and no obvious gap was observed at the interface in both PRG and CS3 groups. There was no dentin demineralization observed in both groups
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.13