检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王斐[1] 刘丽媛[1] 王永久[1] 于理想[1] 周飞[1] 申朔豪 李亮[1] 马忠兵[1] 余之刚[1]
机构地区:[1]山东大学第二医院乳腺外科,山东济南250033
出 处:《中国现代普通外科进展》2016年第9期673-678,共6页Chinese Journal of Current Advances in General Surgery
基 金:山东大学第二医院青年基金资助项目(Y2013 010039)
摘 要:目的:评价体重指数(BMI)与乳腺癌预后的关系。方法:回顾性分析672例乳腺癌患者的临床病例资料及随访信息,根据BMI分为超重肥胖组(BMI≥25.0 kg/m2)与正常组(BMI<25.0 kg/m^2)。Kaplan-Me ie r法比较两组生存差异,非条件Logis tic回归分析不同BMI分组乳腺癌OS的相关因素。结果:456例患者纳入分析,超重肥胖组(286例)与正常组(170例)一般临床病理特征差异无统计学意义(P<0.05)。中位随访60.9个月,两组无病生存时间(DFS)及总生存时间(OS)差异无统计学意义(P=0.927、0.336)。年龄、月经状态、ER及HER2等与不同BMI分类乳腺癌的OS无关。BMI分类不影响新辅助化疗病理性完全缓解(pCR)率,但与新辅助化疗ER阳性乳腺癌的DFS(P=0.013)及OS(P=0.022)有关。超重肥胖组生存较差(OR=0.16,95%CI:0.03~0.93,P=0.042)。内分泌治疗亚组中超重肥胖组病例生存风险降低(OR=0.077,95%CI:0.08~0.714,P=0.024)。结论:BMI≥25.0 kg/m^2是ER阳性乳腺癌新辅助化疗后DFS和OS的危险因素,可能与内分泌治疗获益不足有关。Objective: To evaluate the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and re- sponse and long-term outcome for breast cancer, database of patients treated with chemotherapy was reviewed, and 456 patients With inclusion criteria were identified, Patients were divided into two grodps by BMI: overweight or Obese group (BMI≥25 kg/m2 and non-obese group (BM compared between those two groups, and univariate 〈25 kg/m2. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the factors of predicting long-term outcome stratified by BMI. Results: There was no statistical difference between overweight/obese and non-obese groups in baseline clinic-pathological factors. After a median follow-up period of 60.9 months, statistical difference was observed in neither dis- ease free survival(DFS)(P=0.927) of overall survival(OS) (P=0.336) between the two groups. Clin- ic--pathological factors such as age, menopausal status, ER status and HER2 status etc were not related to OS stratified by BMI. Complete pathological response rate among neoadjuvant groups was 12.1% and 12.5% in overweight/obese and non-obese group respectively, no statistical difference was observed (P=I.000). BMI category was correlated with both DFS (P=0.013)and OS(P=0.022) among ER-positive breast cancer patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, patients with BMI ≥25 kg/m2 experienced poorer OS (OR=0.16,95% CI: 0.03 - 0.93, P=0.042) . And among the subgroups who received adjuvant endocrine therapy, BMI ≥25 kg/m2 decreased the risk of OS (OR=0.077, 95%CI:0.08 - 0.714, P=0.024). Conclusion: BMI ≥25 kg/m2 was correlated with DFS and OS for ER-positive breast cancer patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, insufficient benefit from endocrine therapy may explain this relationship.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.112