从《礼拜六》到“礼拜六派”——兼析二十年代初“新/旧”文学之争  

From Saturday to the "Saturday School" :A Discussion on the "New/old" Debate in the Early 1920s

作　　者：罗萌[1] Luo Meng(Ph. D. , is a post-doctoral fellow in the School of Humanities, Shanghai Jiaotong University （ Shanghai 200240, China)

机构地区：[1]上海交通大学人文学院

出　　处：《文艺理论研究》2016年第5期90-98,共9页Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art

基　　金：国家社科基金一般项目"周瘦鹃全集整理与研究"[项目编号:15BZW132]阶段性成果

摘　　要：本文着重考察了1921至1923年间,"五四"新文化阵营与通俗文人之间发生的激烈论争和对峙。文中的重要关键词"礼拜六派"由著名通俗期刊《礼拜六》引申扩展而来,而"礼拜六派"的命名机制背后,汹涌着一股以"新/旧"论争为中心的文学史漩涡。所谓"新"与"旧"的对峙,落实到"五四"知识分子和通俗作家之间,更像是围绕"新"这一极富吸引力的时代性"象征资本"展开的诠释、竞争和占领。另一方面,二十年代初的论争经验促动了通俗文人去审视、定位和表述自身。This article sheds light on the sharp confrontation between New Culture intellectuals and the popular literati from 1921 to 1923. As a key word, the term ＂ Saturday School＂ is derived from Saturday, an influential popular periodical in early Republican Shanghai. And in fact, the production process of ＂Saturday School＂ was intensely bound up with the ＂new/old＂ debate in modern Chinese literary history. Based on close reading of historical material and contextual analysis, the article concludes that the debate between ＂ new＂ and ＂old＂ was concerned more with the competition over the discourse power of defining ＂what is new＂, which directly led to the control of ＂symbolic capital＂ of the era. Additionally, popular literati＇s experiences of the debate in the early 1920s gave them the motivation for self-positioning and self-presentation.

关 键 词：“新/旧”之争 通俗文学 新文化 《礼拜六》 “礼拜六派” 

分 类 号：I206.6[文学—中国文学]