检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:谭劲松[1,2] 林雨晨[2] Tan Jinsong Lin Yuchen(Center for Accounting, Finance and Institutions, Sun Yat-sen University Sun Yat-sen Business School, Sun Yat-sen University)
机构地区:[1]中山大学现代会计与财务研究中心 [2]中山大学管理学院
出 处:《南开管理评论》2016年第5期115-126,138,共13页Nankai Business Review
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(71272196);广东省人文社科重点研究基地重大项目(2012JDXM-0002)资助
摘 要:机构投资者既是资本市场中重要的参与者,也是完善公司治理机制的重要主体。现有研究着重于机构投资者持股及其后果,对机构投资者的治理行为和机制缺乏深入探讨。本文从理论上对机构投资者的积极行为进行了分析,认为机构投资者有助于通过改善公司治理水平从而提升公司的信息披露质量,并构建了机构治理影响信息披露质量的理论模型,通过理论模型的推导和实证数据的检验,证明了机构投资者的积极治理效应,发现机构投资者调研行为是其参与治理的方式之一。As an important participant in capital market, institutional investors play a principle role in improving corporate governance. Most existing studies have focused on institutional ownership and its economic consequences. Nevertheless, they have not provided sufficient insight on the governance behavior of institutional investors as well as the underlying incentive mechanism. This paper proposes a novel theory to analyze the institutional investors' behavior of active governance, and it shows that such behavior significantly improves the quality of corporate information disclosure. Consistent with our theoretical prediction, our empirical analysis finds strong evidence on the positive governance effect by institutional investors, whose primary approach for involvement in corporate governance is to conduct regular corporate visits. Using the hand-collected data of institutional investors' corporate visits during 2009-2014 in ChiNext, we find that the firms visited by institutional investors are more likely to have a greater tendency of disclosing more information than the firms that have never been visited. In particular, a higher frequency of visits or a larger number of participating institutional investors may lead to a higher degree of disclosure. Consistent with the notion that on-site visits endow institutional investors with more frequent and active interaction with the firms, we find that the results are stronger for firms which are visited on site, when compared with other visit forms such as telephone visits, internet meetings and media credentials etc. In addition, we find that the effect of a site visit is greater when the site visit is conducted by securities companies or funds, rather than insurance companies or QFIIs. We also control for the impact of SOEs, shareholders, board members, firm size, debt, profitability, growth opportunities, auditor opinion and industry on corporate disclosure. Finally, tests of the direction of causality suggest that visits conducted by institutional investors lead
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117