我国民事诉讼专家辅助人诉讼地位探析  

On the Legal Status of Experts in Civil Litigation in China

作　　者：郝巧会 

机构地区：[1]中南财经政法大学,湖北武汉430073

出　　处：《四川职业技术学院学报》2016年第5期23-28,共6页Journal of Sichuan Vocational and Technical College

摘　　要：明确专家辅助人的诉讼地位是完善专家辅助人制度的前提和基础,亦是整个制度的核心。继2002年《证据规定》首次提出专家辅助人制度之后,2012年《民事诉讼法》及2015年《民诉法解释》均对该制度进行了细化规定,但仍未明确专家辅助人的诉讼地位,理论界对此争议颇大,实践中亦出现了专家辅助人诉讼立场不明、席位安排混乱、权利义务模糊、证据认定困难、功能未充分发挥等问题,专家辅助人的诉讼地位亟待明确。通过介绍与评析我国理论界现存的主要学说,最终对我国民事诉讼专家辅助人的诉讼地位作出准确定位,即为诉讼辅佐人。The civil procedure law in 2012 and judicial interpretation of civil procedure law in 2015 detailed to the provisions of the expert assistant system, but the legal status of expert assistant was not to make clear. The theoretical circle has great controversy, and there are many problems in practice. Through the introduction and comments on the main theories in the theory circle in our country, finally, we make an accurate position of the litigation status of experts in civil litigation, which is pointed as the assistant ofthe litigation.

关 键 词：专家辅助人 鉴定人制度 诉讼地位 诉讼辅佐人 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学]