文史分合:章氏国学讲习会与国难之际国学走向  

Literature and History's Unification and Separation:Zhang Taiyan's Seminar on Chinese Studies and the Development of Chinese Studies at the National Crisis

作　　者：张凯[1] 

机构地区：[1]浙江大学历史学系,副教授杭州310028

出　　处：《浙江社会科学》2016年第10期123-130,2+159,共8页Zhejiang Social Sciences

基　　金：教育部人文社科青年基金项目"经今古文之争与近代学术转型"(13YJC770065);"中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助"的阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：章太炎晚年曾与金天翮、陈衍组织成立中国国学会,双方后因人事纠葛与学术立场异趣分道扬镳。金天翮提倡复兴理学,读史明变,文以载道,以诗文感世、传承心史。中国国学会致力于国学研究的提高与普及,激发民族精神,适应学术平民化的潮流。章太炎认为文即是道,国学应不尚空言,坐言起行,以语言文字与经史为宗。章氏国学讲习会旨在为后进示以治学轨辙,守先待后,以民族文化与国族精神整合经史之学与经今古文之争,确立华夏文明的实体性与主体性。以章氏国学讲习会的成立因缘为线索,考察国难时期学术风气转移和派分纠葛,当可呈现近代学术多元走向。In his late years, Zhang Taiyan organized the Association of Chinese Studies with Jin Tianhe and Cheng Yan, but eventually they parted due to different academic views and interests. Jin Tianhe advocated revival of Neo-Confucianism, comprehension of change by studying history, and pursuit of truth by literature. Thus, the Association of Chinese Studies spared no efforts for the improvement and popularity of Chinese Studies, prompting national spirit and adjusting to the tide of popularization of scholarship. However, Zhang Taiyan believed that literature is the truth, and Chinese Studies should be rooted in literature,classics, and history, avoiding empty talk. His Seminar purported to demonstrate the way of scholarship, to guard the past and prepare for the future, and to integrate the Classic Studies, Historiography, and the controversy over Confucian classics with traditional culture and national spirit, trying to build the subjectivity of Chinese civilization. With an investigation of the establishment of the Seminar and an examination of the change and disputes of scholarship, the plural development of modern scholarship will be revealed.

关 键 词：章太炎 金天翮 章氏国学讲习会 中国国学会 国难之际 

分 类 号：K092[历史地理—历史学] B259.2[哲学宗教—中国哲学]