检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:苏菊香[1] 蔡连顺[1] 陈光[1] 代月[1] 张慧明[1] 宫梓琳[1] 车世伟[1]
机构地区:[1]佳木斯大学基础医学院寄生虫学教研室,佳木斯154007
出 处:《中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志》2016年第5期473-475,共3页Chinese Journal of Parasitology and Parasitic Diseases
基 金:佳木斯大学教育科研课题指导项目(No.JKD2012-004)~~
摘 要:为探讨讨论式教学法在医学寄生虫学教学中的应用效果.选择2011级临床医学专业学生,1~3班共156人采用讨论式教学法.4~6班共153人采用传统教学法.通过期末考试和问卷调查对两组学生进行研究和比较.评价讨论式教学组和传统式教学组学生的教学效果及其差异。结果显示,采用讨论式教学法的学生期末成绩为(86.1±6.6)分,高于传统式教学法的学生期末成绩的(74.2±8.3)分(P〈0.05)。89.1%(136/156)的学生对于讨论式教学法的总体评价给予“优”等级,96.8%(151/156)的学生认为讨论式教学法优于传统教学法。槔示讨论式教学法能增强新学的百动件曲蛮了学毕的思维肯式渐发了学毕学习的丰观能动件和探索精神,In this study, students majoring in Clinical Medicine were enrolled to explore the effect of discussion-based teaching method in the teaching of medical parasitology. One hundred and fifty-six students(with an entry year of 2011) in classes 1-3 received the discussion-based teaching while 153 students in classes 4-6 received traditional teaching. The effect of teaching was evaluated in terms of final examination score and questionnaire, and compared between the groups. The final examination score of students receiving the discussion- based teaching (86.1±6.6) was significantly higher than those receiving the traditional teaching (74.2±8.3) (P〈0.05). The discussion-based teaching method was graded as "excellent" by 89.1%(136/156) of the students, and was considered to be superior to the traditional teaching by 96.8%(151/156) of the students. The results indicate that the discussion-based teaching method can enhance interactions between participants, change the ways of thinking, and provide inspirations for learning and exploration.
分 类 号:R38[医药卫生—医学寄生虫学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.46