论非法证据排除的考察基点  

Inspection Basis of Illegal Evidence Elimination

作　　者：李峣[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京政法职业学院法律系,北京106842

出　　处：《河北科技大学学报（社会科学版）》2016年第3期54-58,共5页Journal of Hebei University of Science and Technology:Social Sciences

基　　金：北京政法职业学院2014年专项课题"法官证据裁量权的规则对伪证的处理"

摘　　要：从英美法系国家的发展轨迹来看,自由裁量权是非法证据排除规则进入第一个成熟期的必要条件;而现代价值理念要求放弃对自由裁量权的唯一依赖,谨慎规则和不当证据的接纳规则日益受到关注,这是第二个成熟期。排除规则应该首先具备宪法位阶,在此基础上,排除规则的法定化与自由裁量权关系的正当梳理应该成为我国排除规则发展的路径。From the perspective of development path of the common law of Britain, America and French, discretion is the first necessary condition for maturity about illegal evidence exclusionary. Modern values require to give up the sole reliance on discretion , the cautious and acceptance of the improper grow concern should be given up and this is the second maturity. The exclusionary rule should first have the constitutional rank. On this basis, the exclusion of legitimate combing statutory discretion relations should become the rule exclusion path rule development.

关 键 词：非法证据 宪法位阶 主客观结合 证明路径 

分 类 号：D915.13[政治法律—诉讼法学]