强制出庭作证例外之解释  

The Interpretation of Being Exempted From the Obligation to Appear in Court

作　　者：姜丹[1] Jiang Dan(Renmin University of China, Beijing China 100872)

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学,北京100872

出　　处：《广西政法管理干部学院学报》2016年第5期80-84,共5页Journal of Guangxi Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law

摘　　要：刑事诉讼法第60、188条配偶、父母、子女作证却可以免于强制出庭的规定在实践中是由证人选择是否出庭,无法实现立法意图,现有的解释亦不能提供可操作的方法。症结在于受西方亲属免证权的影响将选择权给予了证人。本文通过对域外亲属免证权的历史和现有规定的研究得出亲属免证权不可以影响被告人的对质权。我国在现有的制度框架下将特定证人出庭作证的选择权交给被告方能妥帖实现立法意图。Article 60,188 practice in that way spouse, parents, children of the defendants should testify but these witnesses have the fight of being exempted from the obligation to appear in court.It can not achieve the purpose of the law and there have been no proper way to solve the problem yet.And I think it is wrong to regard witnesses as the owner of the right. Through the study of Spouse testimonial privilege in other countries, I find that this fight can not have a bad effect on the confrontation fight. In our country ,only give this fight to defendants,can we achieve the legislation intention and protect defendants fight.

关 键 词：亲属免证权 对质权 辩护权 作证却免于强制出庭 

分 类 号：DF733[政治法律—诉讼法学]