司法便民的正当开展及其限度——兼论其在民事再审案件中的开展  

The proper development and limitation of judicial convenience:on the retrial of a review in

作　　者：王杰[1] Wang Jie(Anti Terrorism and Law School, Northwest University of Political and Law, Xian 710063, China)

机构地区：[1]西北政法大学反恐怖主义法学院,陕西西安710063

出　　处：《山西农业大学学报（社会科学版）》2016年第12期869-874,共6页Journal of Shanxi Agricultural University:Social Science Edition

摘　　要：司法便民是符合国情的司法政策。从现代司法原则、社会主义法治理念、司法的政治正确性、中国的社会治理传统和社会转型时期客观需要等角度考察司法便民的法理正当性,从合法性与合理性两个维度来分析司法便民措施的限度,结合民事再审制度的"纠错"、"疏导"和"应对"等功能以及四川省法院的工作实践,来探究在民事再审案件审查中开展便民措施的原理和具体内容。Justice is in line with the national legal policy.From the modern judicial principle,the socialist concept of rule of law,judicial political correctness,China social governance tradition and social transformation period objective perspective to study the legitimacy of judicial convenience,to analyze the judicial convenience measures from the legitimacy and rationality of the two dimensions of the limits of civil retrial system,combined with the ＂correction＂, ＂counseling＂ and ＂coping＂ features such as Sichuan province court practice,to explore the case of retrial principles of convenience measures a review and specific content in civil.

关 键 词：司法便民 民事再审 便民措施 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学]