检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张钧[1] 韩慧娜 李振生[1] 孔德友[1] 张安度[1] 孔洁[1] 张舰[1] Zhang Jun Han Huina Li Zhensheng Kong Deyou Zhang Andu Kong Jie Zhang Jian(Department of Radiation Oncology, Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050017, China)
机构地区:[1]河北医科大学第四医院放疗科,石家庄050011
出 处:《中华放射肿瘤学杂志》2016年第11期1192-1198,共7页Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology
摘 要:目的:回顾分析术后放疗对乳腺癌分子亚型与生存关系的影响。方法对2008年收治的716例首次行单侧乳腺癌手术女性患者,按2011 St. Gallen标准分为Luminal A型( LA)、B.HER.2阴性型(LB1)、Luminal B.HER.2阳性型(LB2)、HER.2过表达型(HER.2+)、三阴型(TN)和未分型组。采用Cox模型分析总体、非放疗、放疗组中亚型间 OS 和 DFS 差异。 Kaplan.Meier 法计算 OS、DFS,Cox模型因素分析。结果中位随访71.4个月,总死亡率为10.5%、治疗失败(死亡+复发+转移)率为14.9%。术后放疗组217例(30.3%)。多因素分析OS在各组中亚型间差异均无统计学意义( P均>0.05);DFS在总体中LB1、未分型较LA型的差( HR=1.881、1.907,P=0.035、0.049),在非放疗组中LB1较LA型的差( HR=3.324,P=0.01);在放疗组中各亚型的均相近( P均>0.05)。放疗和亚型二维交叉分析表明非放疗组LB1与放疗组LA比较有降低OS ( P=0.09)和DFS ( P=0.06)趋势。结论与LA型相比,LB1型有降低OS、DFS趋势,以非放疗患者明显;放疗对分子亚型和生存预后关系无影响。Objective To retrospectively investigate the impact of postoperative radiotherapy ( RT) on the relationship between molecular subtype and survival in patients with breast cancer ( BC ) . Methods A total of 716 women who were admitted to our hospital in 2008 and newly received unilateral mastectomy were divided into Luminal A ( LA ) , Luminal B.HER.2.negative ( LB1 ) , Luminal B.HER.2.positive ( LB2) , HER.2 overexpression ( HER.2+) , triple.negative ( TN) , and unassigned subtypes according to the 2011 St. Gallen Consensus. The Cox model was used to analyze the differences in overall survival ( OS) and disease.free survival ( DFS ) rates between subtypes in all patients, RT group, or non.RT group. The Kaplan.Meier method was used to calculate OS and DFS rates. The Cox model was used to perform the factor analysis. Results In all patients, the median follow.up time was 71.4 months;the overall mortality rate was 10.5%;the incidence of treatment failure ( death+relapse+metastasis) was 14.9%;217 patients ( 30.3%) received RT. The multivariate analysis showed that there was no significant difference in OS between subtypes in any group ( all P〉0.05 ) . In all patients, patients with LB1 subtype or unassigned subtype had significantly poorer DFS rates than those with LA subtype ( HR= 1.881, P= 0.035;HR= 1.907, P=0.049) . In the non.RT group, patients with LB1 subtype had significantly poorer DFS rates than those with LA subtype (HR=3.324, P=0.01). In the RT group, there was no significant difference in DFS rate between subtypes ( all P〉0.05) . The two.dimensional cross analyses of RT and subtype demonstrated that patients with LB1 subtype in the non.RT group had lower OS and DFS rates than patients with LA subtype in the RT group ( P=0.09,0.06) . Conclusions Patients with LB1 subtype have lower OS and DFS rates than patients with LA subtype, especially in the non.RT patients. RT has no impact on the relationship between subtype and prognosis.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.52