检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]解放军307医院乳腺外科,北京100071 [2]军事医学科学院基础医学研究所 [3]解放军空军总医院普外科
出 处:《西南国防医药》2016年第11期1256-1259,共4页Medical Journal of National Defending Forces in Southwest China
摘 要:目的分析化疗方案ET(表柔比星+多西他赛)与EC-T(表柔比星+环磷酰胺序贯多西他赛)对新辅助化疗乳腺癌患者的效果及副反应。方法回顾性对比我院119例行新辅助化疗的Ⅱ-Ⅲ期乳腺癌患者的临床病理特征(ET方案68例、EC-T方案51例),治疗6个周期后观察比较两组治疗效果和副反应差异。结果 EC-T组的病理治疗有效率为80.4%,显著高于ET组的63.2%(P〈0.05),而两组间保乳率、临床治疗有效率及副反应发生率比较均无统计学差异(P〉0.05)。结论 EC-T方案在不增加副反应的基础上,病理治疗有效率优于ET方案,可使新辅助化疗的乳腺癌患者预后更好。Objective To analyze the effects of chemotherapy regimens ET(epirubicin + taxotere) and EC-T(epirubicin +cyclophosphamide taxotere) on the neoadjuvant chemotherapy(NACT) of breast cancer and the side reactions. Methods The clinical pathological characteristics of a total of 119 patients with Ⅱ-Ⅲ stage breast cancer treated with NACT in our hospital(68 with ET regimen and 51 with EC-T) were compared and analyzed in a retrospective manner. The efficacy and side reactions in the two groups after six treatment cycles were observed and compared. Results The pathologically effective rate was 80.4% in EC-T group, which was significantly higher than 63.2% in ET group(P〈0.05), but there was no significant difference in clinically effective rates, the breast-conserving rates and the common side reactions between the two groups(P〈0.05). Conclusions EC-T regimen may have higher efficiency of pathological treatment than ET regimen without increasing any side reactions, ensuring better prognosis of patients with breast cancer treated with NACT.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15