检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:朱伟
机构地区:[1]浙江省遂昌县人民法院刑事审判庭,浙江遂昌323300
出 处:《西华大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2016年第6期75-78,共4页Journal of Xihua University(Philosophy & Social Sciences)
摘 要:完善刑事诉讼中的认罪认罚从宽制度,是对我国宽严相济刑事政策的制度化,也是对我国刑事诉讼程序的创新。长期以来,我国的认罪认罚从宽制度在实体和程序上还存在一定的不足,因此应予以完善。本文借鉴美国诉辩交易制度中的合理成分,并结合我国当前的法治状况和司法环境,构建"协商性"的认罪认罚从宽制度。The improvement of the leniency policy for guilty plea and punishment acceptance is the institutionalization of criminal policy of combining punishment with leniency and the innovation of criminal prosecution procedure. For a long time,the leniency policy for guilty plea and punishment acceptance has been inadequate in entity and procedure,so we should improve it. Borrowing from American plea bargaining system and taking our current situation of rule by law and judicial environment into consideration,this thesis attempts to improve the 'negotiable'leniency policy for guilty plea and punishment acceptance.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117