施瓦茨价值观问卷(PVQ-21)中文版在大学生中的修订  

Reliability and Validality Test for Schwartz's the Portrait Values Questionnaire(PVQ-21)in Chinese College Students

作　　者：高志华 杨绍清 Juergen Margraf XiaoChi Zhang 路平[3] 

机构地区：[1]中国.华北理工大学心理学院,河北唐山063000 [2]Ruhr University Bochum,Germany Bochum [3]黑龙江大学教育学院,黑龙江哈尔滨150080

出　　处：《中国健康心理学杂志》2016年第11期1684-1688,共5页China Journal of Health Psychology

基　　金：中德合作项目“Bochum Optimism and Mental Health”(BOOM)研究成果;黑龙江省教育科学“十二五”规划重点课题“大学生学业心理健康整合式研究:内涵、现状、心理基础与教育途径”(编号:GBB1212045)

摘　　要：目的：对施瓦茨价值观问卷（PVQ-21）中文版在在校大学生和研究生中进行修订。方法：根据量表修订的方法,在某大学选取3351名在校大学生和研究生被试进行测试,分析中文版的信度和效度。结果：项目分析结果表明,PVQ-21各项目的项目鉴别力良好（r=0.753-0.907）;内部一致性系数为0.337-0.742,分半信度为0.337-0.746,重测信度0.151-0.669;PVQ-21的最小空间分析结果基本符合理论模型;PVQ-21与心理一致感利兹堡简短版（SOC-L9）和Connor-Davidson韧性量表（CD-RISC）显著相关,效标关联效度理想。结论：施瓦茨价值观量表（PVQ-21）中文版在大学生中具有较高的信效度。Objective：To test the reliability and validality of Schwartz＇s the Portrait Values Questionnaire（PVQ-21）in Chinese college students.Methods：3351college students and graduated students were tested by the Portrait Values Questionnaire（PVQ-21）in Chinese,with SCL-90,SOC-L9 and CD-RISC as criterion surveys,and analyzing its reliability and validality.Results：Item analysis demonstrated that each item of PVQ-21 had a good discriminability（r=0.753-0.907）;Cronbachs＇ αcoefficients were 0.337-0.742,split-half were 0.337-0.746,and re-test were 0.151-0.669.PVQ-21 had a good fitness with the theoretical modal of Schwartz in smallest space analysis.PVQ-21 also had high correlationships with SOC-L9 and CD-RISC.Conclusion：Schwartz＇s the Portrait Values Questionnaire（PVQ-21）in Chinese has good reliability and validality.

关 键 词：施瓦茨价值观 施瓦茨价值观问卷(PVQ-21) 信度 效度 最小空间分析 

分 类 号：R395.9[哲学宗教—心理学] B841.7[医药卫生—医学心理学]