王力《古代汉语》疑义四则  

Four Doubt Cases of Wang Li's Ancient Chinese

作　　者：吴春生[1] 

机构地区：[1]遵义师范学院人文与传媒学院,贵州遵义563000

出　　处：《三明学院学报》2016年第5期46-49,共4页Journal of Sanming University

基　　金：贵州省教育厅高校人文社科项目(2015ZC039)

摘　　要：王力《古代汉语》文选中存在着较多疑难词句,比如"寡人是徵""矢贯余手及肘""进而问之曰"等。在"寡人是徵"中,利用上下句对举关系,否定了"寡人是徵"之"是"指代包茅,从而否定了"徵"为"索取";在"矢贯余手及肘"中,利用《楚辞》中例句否定了两支箭的说法;对"进而问之曰"中"进而",从语言事实出发,对无注的"进而"和虽注但不详的"开罪"予以分析,"进而"为"进"+"而","开罪"即为"得罪"。There are many doubt cases in Wang Li＇s Ancient Chinese,such as ＂gua ren shi zheng（寡 人是徵）＂ ＂shi guan yu shou ji zhou（矢 贯余手及肘）＂ ＂jin er wen zhi yue（ 进 而问之曰）＂and so on.By the relationship of antithetic sentence,the＂shi（是）＂of ＂gua ren shi zheng（寡 人是徵）＂does not refer to the couch grass,and the explanation of＂zheng（ 徵）＂ does not mean ＂suo qu（索取）＂;By the sentence of Chuci, we negative the statement of the two disputed arrows of ＂shi guan yu shou ji zhou（矢 贯余手及肘）＂.From the language facts to investigate the ＂jin er（ 进 而）＂ and ＂kai zui（开 罪）＂, it is known that the＂jin er（进而）＂ equals to ＂jin（进）＂＋＂er（而）＂,and the ＂kai zui（开罪）＂ equals to ＂de zui（得罪）＂.

关 键 词：王力 《古代汉语》 疑义 

分 类 号：H13[语言文字—汉语]