检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:程晓彤 王菲菲[2] 陈枭[1] 侯文杰[1] 赵杨[1] 王欢[1] 王皖曦 赵梦雪[2] 张晶轩[2] 杨国愉[2]
机构地区:[1]第三军医大学学员旅,重庆400038 [2]第三军医大学心理学院军人发展与教育心理学教研室,重庆400038
出 处:《第三军医大学学报》2016年第22期2470-2473,共4页Journal of Third Military Medical University
基 金:全军医药卫生"十二五"重大项目(AWS13J003);国家社科学基金(11XSH016);重庆市研究生教育教学改革研究项目(yjg133087);重庆市研究生教育教学改革研究项目(yjg153027);大学生创新创业训练项目(201490035023)~~
摘 要:目的探讨声音片段诱导的不同情绪背景对来源记忆的影响。方法采用来源记忆测试的多键范式,采用3×4二因素被试内设计,对不同情绪背景下来源记忆的反应时和正确率进行测试,分析其差异。结果 3种情绪背景下,来源正确和来源错误的反应时和正确率与新刺激差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);正性和负性情绪背景下来源错误和来源正确的反应时和正确率差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);被试的反应时和正确率的情绪效应不显著(P>0.05)。结论声音片段诱导的不同情绪背景下来源记忆比项目记忆的认知操作更复杂,需时更长,而且在不能提取来源或对提取的来源不确定时,反应时会延长。Objective To study the effect of different emotional backgrounds induced by sound clips on source memory. Methods In this study, we used multi-key paradigm of source memory test, with a 2- factor (3 ×4) fractional design, to measure the subjects' reaction time and accuracy of source memory in different emotional background. The differences among different backgrounds/stimulations were statistically analyzed. Results Under 3 emotional backgrounds, reaction time and accuracy rate of the subjects responding to both correct and false sources differed significantly from those underwent new stimulus (P 〈 0.01 ). The reaction time and accuracy rate were also significantly different between the positive and negative backgrounds(P 〈 0.01 ) but not the emotional effect ( P 〉 0. 05 ). Conclusion Under different emotional contexts induced by sound clips, source memory is more complicated and time-consuming than item memory even under the same stimulation. Moreover, the reaction time is prolonged when the source can not be extracted or the extraction is uncertain.
分 类 号:B842.2[哲学宗教—基础心理学] B842.3[哲学宗教—心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.112