检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:葛永梅[1] 李凡卡[1] 马晓玲[2] 王楠[1]
机构地区:[1]石河子大学医学院预防医学系,石河子832000 [2]新疆生产建设兵团疾病预防控制中心疾病预防控制科,乌鲁木齐830002
出 处:《中华地方病学杂志》2016年第11期850-853,共4页Chinese Journal of Endemiology
基 金:国家“十一五”科技支撑计划(2006BAI06B05)
摘 要:目的分析新疆生产建设兵团(简称兵团)2015年碘缺乏病监测数据结果,为进一步提高数据监测质量、优化防治策略提供依据。方法采用TOPSIS(techniquefororderpreferencebysimilaritytoidealsolution)法从碘盐覆盖率、碘盐合格率、居民合格碘盐食用率、儿童甲状腺肿大率、儿童尿碘中位数、孕妇尿碘中位数6个指标对兵团13个师2015年碘缺乏病监测数据进行综合评价和分析。结果各单一指标结果反映,2015年兵团居民合格碘盐食用率〈90%(即没有达到国家碘缺乏病消除标准)的师有5个,分别是二师(76.33%),三师(89.33%),十二师(81.67%),十三师(87.30%),十四师(72.00%),其余指标结果都符合国家碘缺乏病消除标准;TOPSIS法综合6个指标的评价结果显示,13个师碘缺乏病防治效果从优至劣依次为:第八师、六师、五师、一师、二师、十师、九师、七师、三师、四师、十三师、十二师、十四师,与实际情况相符。结论TOPSIS法方法简单、计算方便,在碘缺乏病防治监测工作的综合评价中,具有较好的应用价值。Objective To analyze the data of iodine deficiency disorders (IDD) surveillance in 2015 and provide a basis for further improving the quality of data monitoring and optimizing control strategies in Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps (Corps). Methods Comprehensive evaluation and analysis were carried out on data of IDD surveillance including coverage rate of iodized salt, qualified rate of iodized salt, and proportion of households consuming qualified iodized salt, goiter rate of children, median urinary iodine of children and median urinary iodine of pregnant women in 2015 by technique for order preferenceby similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) method in 13 divisions of the Corps. Results In 2015, the consumption rate of qualified iodized salt of the second, third, twelfth, thirteenth, and the fourteenth divisions was 76.33%, 89.33%, 81.67%, 87.30% and 72.00% in Corps reflected by each single index.result, these figures had not reached the national standard (the consumption rate of qualified iodized salt greater than 90%), the rest of the indicators had achieved the national standard; based on the six indicators of TOPSIS method, the evaluation results showed that IDD prevention effect was as follows in a decreasing order: the eighth, sixth, fifth, first, second, tenth, ninth, seventh, third, fourth, thirteenth, twelfth and the fourteenth divisions. Conclusion TOPSIS method as one of a comprehensive evaluation methods is simple, convenient and suitable for comprehensive evaluation in IDD surveillance.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.12.136.98