检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王芳军[1] 高昳 赵可[2] 汪娟[2] 刘华敏[1] 刘鹏飞[1] Wang Fangjun Gao Yi Zhao Ke Wang Juan Liu Huamin Liu Pengfei(Department of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Jiangyin Hospital of Southeast University Medical School, Jiangyin 214400, China)
机构地区:[1]东南大学医学院附属江阴医院消化内科,江苏省江阴市214400 [2]东南大学医学院附属江阴医院病理科,江苏省江阴市214400
出 处:《中华消化内镜杂志》2016年第11期764-768,共5页Chinese Journal of Digestive Endoscopy
基 金:无锡市卫生局重大科研项目(Z201509)
摘 要:目的评价在Barrett食管的随访监测中应用窄带成像放大内镜(NBI—ME)指导靶向活检的价值。方法2012年9月至2015年5月,96例病理诊断为Barrett食管的患者,采用配对交叉设计,通过计算机软件随机决定先行白光内镜(WLI)的四象限活检(wu组)或NBI—ME的靶向活检(NBI—ME组),1—3个月后换另一种方法观察及活检,对比分析两种模式下的活检情况。结果有88例完成整个研究,最终病理结果显示4例无特殊的肠上皮化生(SIM)、55例为SIM、23例为低级别上皮内瘤变、6例为高级别上皮内瘤变。WLI组平均每例取活检数量明显多于NBI.ME组(5.3块比3.1块,P〈0.05),上皮内瘤变检出率明显低于NBI—ME组[21.6%(19/88)比31.8%(28/88),P〈O.05],上皮内瘤变诊断准确率亦明显低于NBI—ME组[58.6%(17/29)比93.1%(27/29),P〈0.05]。结论在Barrett食管的随访监测中,NBI—ME指导靶向活检的临床价值较高。相比WLI的四象限活检,更易发现上皮内瘤变及准确分级,并且所需活检数量更少。Objective To assess the value of NBI-ME for targeting biopsy in the follow-up of Barrett esophagus. Methods A total of 96 patients with Barrett esophagus were enrolled and biopsied between Sep- tember 2012 and May 2015. With paired crossover design, the patients were randomly allocated to receive a WLI or NBI-ME, who received the other examination in 1-3 months. Outcomes of NBI-ME and WLI were compared with histology of biopsy specimen, and the biopsy quantities were also compared. Results A total of 88 patients completed the study, 4 cases with non-specialized intestinal metaplasia,55 cases with special- ized intestinal metaplasia (SIM) ,23 cases with low grade intraepithelial neoplasia(LGIN) and 6 cases with high grade intraepithelial neoplasia(HGIN) were detected. The biopsy number of WLI group was higher than that of NBI-ME group( 5.3 VS 3.1 ,P〈0.05).The incidence of intraepithelial neoplasia of WLI was lower than that of NBI-ME [ 21.6% (19/88) VS 31.8% ( 28/88), P〈 0. 05 ]. Diagnostic accuracy of WLI was lower than that of NBI-ME[ 58. 6% (17/26) VS 93.1%(27/29) ,P〈0. 05) ]. Conclusion NBI-ME can detect more lesions of intraepithelial neoplasia than WLI in the follow-up of Barrett esophagus, and fewer biopsy specimens are needed.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.14.133.134