TEM4词汇题的语境缺失及识解策略  

On the Lack of Context in Vocabulary Items of TEM 4 and the Construal Strategy

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:赵勇[1] 

机构地区:[1]文山学院外国语学院,云南文山663099

出  处:《文山学院学报》2016年第5期83-86,共4页Journal of Wenshan University

摘  要:不同专家对TEM4词汇测试中某些相同的题目给出了不同的解答和解析,其构成了客观存在的疑难词汇题。认知语义学的理想化认知模型(ICM)和识解理论为理解模糊性、动态性语义提供了新的理论依据和视角。据此,解答和解析不同是因为解题人使用的语义模型不同,而导致语义模型不同的原因是此类题题干提供的语境信息不充分。因此,词汇命题题干应给出充分的语境信息,基于"题干ICM+词义辨析"策略才能识解出最佳选项,这样才能保证词汇测试的客观性和精确性。Different professors provide different analysis and answers to some same items in TEM4 Vocabulary Test, which is an objectively existing problem. Ideal Cognitive Model and Construal Theories in Cognitive Linguistics provide new theoretical foundation and perspective for understanding fuzzy and dynamic meanings. Based on the frame, the basic reason for this is that answer providers use different meaning models, and reason for that is that the fuzzy test items don't contain sufficient information. Therefore, sufficient information should be provided in the test items. Only in this way can we fi nd out the best answer by using the strategy of "stem's ICM and semantic discrimination" and safeguard the vocabulary test's objectivity and accurancy.

关 键 词:TEM4词汇测试 认知语义学 ICM 词义辨析 识解 

分 类 号:H319.34[语言文字—英语]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象