究竟是“失语”还是“得语”——兼论“失语症”的解决之道  

Whether It Is Having Nothing to Say or Having Something to Say—On the Solution to Having Nothing to Say

作　　者：陈梦熊[1] 

机构地区：[1]西南大学文学院,重庆400715

出　　处：《重庆工商大学学报（社会科学版）》2016年第6期119-124,共6页Journal of Chongqing Technology and Business University：Social Science Edition

摘　　要：在中国现代文论建设中,"失语"现象时有发生,却不是主体;更为主流的是中西文论在遵循精神契合性、民族性、传统性基础上的"得语"。在20世纪的杜甫研究中,"人民性""现实主义""民胞物与"等概念的提出,显示出中国文论强大的生命力,是"得语"的明证。疗治"失语症"应该尊重中国文论建设基本规律的前提下,准确认清古代文论在当代社会的文化定位,以及它在经历百年现代化历史进程之后的社会属性,较少掺杂民族主义情感,代之以学理性的分析,重新评估中国现当代文学的创作实际。In the modern literature discussion of China,there is frequently having nothing to say,but it is not the main body. More mainstreaming is having something to say based on compatibility,nationality and tradition in Chinese and western literature discussion.In the Du Fu research in the 20 thcentury,the advance of the concept of people's character,realism and people being my brothers and I sharing the life of all creatures demonstrates the strong vitality of Chinese literature discussion,which is the verification of having something to say. The treatment of having nothing to say should be under the premise of Chinese literature discussion,should clarify the cultural position of ancient literature discussion in modern society and its social attribute in the process of one hundred years modernization experience history,should seldom adulterate nationalism feelings,should use the learning rationality analysis and should reevaluate the creating practice of Chinese modern literature.

关 键 词：失语症 得语 契合性 民族性 传统性 现代性体验 

分 类 号：I206[文学—中国文学]