独生与非独生大学生16种人格因素差异的Meta分析  

Difference between only child and non-only child college students' 16PF:a meta-analytic review

作　　者：周振华[1] 李燕[1] 胡捷[1] 李东阳[1] ZHOU Zhen-hua LI Yan I-IU Jie LI Dong-yang(Teaching and Research Section of Psychology, School of Medical Humanities, Guiyang College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang Guizhou 550002, Chin)

机构地区：[1]贵阳中医学院医学人文学院心理学教研室,贵州贵阳550002

出　　处：《现代预防医学》2016年第22期4139-4142,共4页Modern Preventive Medicine

基　　金：2014年贵州省教育厅高校人文社科规划研究项目;编号:14GH066

摘　　要：目的了解独生与非独生大学生16种人格因素是否存在差异及其影响因素。方法采用Meta分析法对2004-2013年间的13篇入组研究文献(均采用16PF量表)共14组数据进行统计分析。结果 (1)独生大学生在乐群性、敢为性、敏感性、幻想性上的得分均高于非独生子女,平均效果量分别为d=0.10(P<0.001),d=0.11(P<0.05),d=0.09(P<0.05),d=0.12(P<0.001);失效安全系数Nfs0.05分别为48、17、36、10。(2)在多层线性模型中,恃强性、独立性受被试年级的影响(β1=-0.097,-0.097;均P<0.05);兴奋性受发表刊物质量的影响(β1=0.095;P<0.05);怀疑性受被试来源地(β1=0.075,P<0.05)和量表版本(β1=0.097,P<0.05)的影响。结论独生与非独生大学生在乐群性、敢为性、敏感性、幻想性4种人格因素方面存在统计学差异;恃强性、独立性与被试年级相关,兴奋性与发表刊物质量相关,怀疑性与被试来源地和量表版本相关。Objective The aim of this study was to review the differences between only child and non-only child college students in 16 personality factors and their affecting factors. Methods Meta-analytic method was used to calculate 14 groups of data in 13 studies with 16 PF as a tool from 2004 to 2013. Results （1） The scores of only child college students were higher than those of non-only college students on warmth, social boldness, sensitivity, abstractness, and four average effect sizes were 0.10 （P〈0.001）, 0.11 （P〈0.05）, 0.09 （P〈0.05）, 0.12 （P〈0.001）, and four fail-safe number （Nfs 0.05） were 48, 17, 36, and 10. （2） In the multi-level models, aggressiveness, self-reliance were influenced by age group （β1=-0.097, -0.097, all P〈 0.05）. Liveliness was influenced by quality-of-publication （β1=0.095, P〈0.05）. Suspicion was influenced by region （fit= 0.075,P〈0.05） and scale edition （β1=0.097, P〈0.05）. Conclusion There were statistical differences between only child and non-only child college students in four personality factors （warmth, social boldness, sensitivity, and abstractness）. Aggressiveness and self-reliance was related with age group. Liveliness was related with quality-of-publication. Suspicion was related with region and scale edition.

关 键 词：独生子女 大学生 16PF META分析 

分 类 号：R181.2[医药卫生—流行病学]