法律规范冲突的逻辑性质  

On The Logical Nature of Conflicts between Legal Norms

作　　者：雷磊[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学法理学研究所,北京102249

出　　处：《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》2016年第6期3-18,共16页Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law

基　　金：中国政法大学优秀中青年教师培养支持资助项目;国家社科基金青年项目(13CFX007)"法律规范的元理论研究"

摘　　要：法律规范之间的冲突是不是逻辑矛盾的问题是法律逻辑的前提性难题之一。凯尔森对这一问题的观点经过两次转变,最终采纳了否定说。但作为否定说主要支柱的效力论据误解了逻辑的性质及其适用的领域,弱化"效力"概念的做法只是转移或掩盖了问题,只有在区分规范的两种观念基础上彻底脱离"效力"概念才能走出困境。逻辑法则适用于法律规范间的冲突有其认知必要性与实践必要性。在此理论准备之下,肯定说能够证明,规范冲突可以被直接呈现或还原为逻辑矛盾的两种基本形式,即道义内部矛盾(反对性矛盾)与道义外部矛盾(对立性矛盾)。逻辑只适用于语义学规范的领域,但基于实践理性的假定,它对于规范创设者的行为同样会发生约束。Whether the conflicts between legal norms are logical contradiction or not, is a prerequisite problem for juridical logic. Hans Kelsen has changed his views all his life twice on this problem, finally adopting a denial attitude. However, the argument from validity, as a main fulcrum for this attitude, mistakes the nature of logic and its applicative field. The way of loosening the concept of ＂ validity＂ transfers or disguises the real issue. Only a thorough abandonment of the concept of ＂validity＂ on the basis of distinguishing two conceptions about norms, is the right way to get ride of this dilem- ma. There are necessities both in recognition and practice for the application of logical laws in conflicts between legal norms. After this theoretical preparation, the affirmative attitude proves that, conflicts between norms can be presented directly as or reduced indirectly into two basic forms of logical contradiction, i. e. , external deontic contradiction （ contrary contradiction） and internal deontic contradiction（oppositional contradiction）. Logic functions only in the field of semantic norms, but also constrains the conducts of norms - givers on the assumption of practical reason.

关 键 词：逻辑 语义学规范 反对性矛盾 对立性矛盾 

分 类 号：DF211[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]