裁判事实构建中的叙事及其评估——以批判性思维为视角  

On the Evaluation and Narrative Construction of Judicial Fact ——In the perspective of critical thinking

作　　者：于辉[1] YU Hui(Law school of Nanchang Institute of Technology, Nanchang Jiangxi 330044, Chin)

机构地区：[1]南昌理工学院法学院,江西南昌330044

出　　处：《法学论坛》2016年第6期68-77,共10页Legal Forum

基　　金：国家社科基金重点项目<法律论证逻辑研究--面向"法治中国"建设的整合性和应用性研究>(15AZX019)的部分成果

摘　　要：在裁判事实叙事构建过程中,叙事者通过言语行为、修辞技巧将碎片化的证据信息整合成为完整的、融贯的、一致的故事模型,但该模型毕竟仅是叙事者对过往事实的次级感知,其内容并不能引起内心确信或者排除合理性怀疑,因此,司法裁决者有必要运用批判性问题评估法,在批判与回应的对话剖面中检验裁判事实建构中的各种叙事主张,使主观的怀疑接受客观层次的检验,并从中识别出与故事假说不符合的例外情形,予以排除或反驳,从而实现裁判事实叙事构建中的"可接受性"。In the process of narrative construction of judicial fact, Narrator will integrated fragmented evidence information into a complete, coherence, consistent story model through verbal behavior, rhetorical skills. However, the model is only a subprime perception of the past facts by narrator, the content does not cause truth conviction or beyond reasonable doubt. Therefore, it is necessary for judicial judgment to apply the evaluated method of critical question. In the critical and response dialogue profile, it inspect the various narrative proposition in the process of judicial fact finding, and identify the exception of the hypothesis that is not in conformity with the story referee , and then excluded or retort , in order to realize the goal of the acceptability in the process of narrative construction of judicial fact.

关 键 词：裁判事实 修辞技巧 批判性问题评估法 

分 类 号：D90[政治法律—法学理论]