立足人才培养本位 多环节促进学位授权点合格评估——基于英国QAA学科评估与我国学位点合格评估的比较分析  

Focus onPersonnel Cultivation and Improve Assessment Work on Academic Degree Authorization Centers from Multiple Aspects——Based on Comparative Analysis of British QAA Subject Review Method and the Authorization Center Qualification Assessment in China

作　　者：李爱彬[1] 郑文奇[2] 

机构地区：[1]中国矿业大学学科建设处,江苏徐州22116 [2]中国矿业大学文法学院,江苏徐州22116

出　　处：《研究生教育研究》2016年第6期86-91,共6页Journal of Graduate Education

基　　金：江苏省社科基金"基于‘双一流’目标的江苏高校优势学科绩效评价提升路径研究"(项目编号:16JYB001);江苏省2015年度研究生教育教学改革研究与实践课题"江苏高校优势学科核心竞争力评价与培育研究"(JGLX15_035)

摘　　要：我国当前正在开展的学位授权点合格评估是保证学位与研究生教育质量的重要手段。从评估内容、评估标准、评估流程、评估结果的使用等方面对英国QAA学科评估与我国开展学位授权点合格评估的特点进行了比较分析,认为在组织实施我国学位授权点合格评估过程中,可借鉴QAA学科评估较为成熟的经验和做法,构建学位授权点合格评估机制,进一步聚焦评估内容,强化人才培养评价;以国家标准为依据,自主确定评估标准;以自评为主导,与外部评估相结合;以学生为中心,充分重视学习体验;科学使用结果,达成人才培养目标。The current qualification assessment on academic degree authorization centers in China is an important means to ensure the quality of academic degree and the quality of postgraduate education. This paper compares and analyzes, from the aspects of assessment items, criteria, process and the application of the assessment outcomes, the characteristics of the British QAA subject review method and the qualification assessment in China. The paper also argues that the experience and practice of the QAA method can be used in organizing assessment in China, so as to improve the qualification assessment mechanism for the degree authorization centers. Specific strengthen personnel cultivation evaluation; proposals this paper raises include; independently define evaluation criteria further focus on assessment content and based on the national standard; regard selfevaluation as the dominant factor and take external evaluations into consideration when making a conclusion; spotlight performance of students and attach more importance to their learning experience~ and make scientific use of the outcomes for the purpose of cultivating students.

关 键 词：学位授权点 合格评估 QAA学科评估 人才培养 比较分析 

分 类 号：G643[文化科学—高等教育学]