磁共振扩散加权成像联合Gd-EOB-DTPA定量分析肝纤维化  被引量:9

Quantitative evaluation of liver fibrosis with combination of DWI and Gd-EOB-DTPA

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:崔恩铭[1] 龙晚生[1] 李卓永[1] 兰勇[1] 黄列彬 梁启堂[2] 李青[2] 

机构地区:[1]江门市中心医院放射科,广东江门529030 [2]江门市中心医院病理科,广东江门529030

出  处:《实用放射学杂志》2016年第11期1702-1705,共4页Journal of Practical Radiology

基  金:江门市科学技术项目[2013]81-44.

摘  要:目的探讨磁共振扩散加权成像(DWI)联合肝特异性对比剂Gd-EOB-DTPA评估肝纤维化的价值。方法对79例慢性肝炎患者行DWt及Gd-EOB-DTPA肝胆期成像,分别测量及计算其表观扩散系数(ADC)和肝胆期相对强化值(RE)。采用Logistic回归分析RE、ADC与肝纤维化病理分期的相关性。以肝纤维化s≥2和s≥3为阳性标准,分别对ADC组、RE组及ADC+RE组行受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)分析,曲线下面积(AUC)两两分析采用Z检验。结果经Logistic回归分析,RE、ADC均为S≥2和s≥3级肝纤维化的独立影响因素。在诊断s≥2时,ADC组AUC为0.861,以ADC=0.56×10^-3mm2/s为阈值,其敏感度为83.33%,特异度为85.71%;RE组AUC为0.771,以RE=1.03为阈值,其敏感度为86.67%,特异度为71.43%;ADC+RE组AUC为0.922,以Logit(P)=8.16为阈值,其敏感度为90.。0%,特异度为91.84%。在诊断肝纤维化S≥3时,ADC组AUC为0.807,以ADC=0.53×10^-3mm^2/s为阈值,其敏感度为86.96%,特异度为78.57%,;RE组AUC为0.748,以RE=0.89为阈值,其敏感度为78.26%,特异度为76.79%;ADC+RE组AUC为0.906,以Logit(P)=8.73为阈值,其敏感度为82.61%,特异度为89.29%。除诊断s≥3时ADC组敏感度最高外,ADc+RE组在诊断肝纤维化s≥2、s≥3时敏感度、特异度及AUC均较单一指标更高,且其AUC分别与ADC组(Zs2=2.352、Zs2=2.158)和RE组(Zs2=2.465、Zs2=2.487)两两比较有统计学差异(P〈0.05)。结论ADc及RE均能用于量化评估肝纤维化,2个指标联合评估能明显提高判定效能。Objective To explore the value of combination of diffusion weight imaging (DWI) and G&EOB-DTPA in the staging of liver fibrosis. Methods 79 patients with chronic hepatitis underwent DWI and Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI, meanwhile the apparent dif- fusion coefficient (ADC) with DWI of the liver were measured and relative enhancement ratio (RE) with hepatohiliary phase imaging of Gd-EOB-DTPA were also calculated. Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the correlation between the pathological sta- ges of liver fibrosis and the values of ADC and RE. According to the pathological stages of liver fibrosis, the abilities of ADC, RE and ADC+RE in the staging of liver fibrosis were assessed by using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Moreover, the Z statistics were used to analyze the area under the curve {AUC} between each two groups. Results The results of Logistic regression analysis showed that both RE and ADC were independent variables in the staging of liver fibrosis (S≥2, S≥3 ). In diagnosis of liver fibrosis S≥2, the AUC was 0. 861, and the sensitivity and specificity were 88.33% and 85.71% with cutoff of ADC=0.56X 10^-3 mm^2/s in ADC group. Meanwhile, the AUC was 0. 771, and the sensitivity and specificity were 86.67% and 71.43% with cutoff of RE= 1.03 in RE group. The AUC was 0. 922, and the sensitivity and specificity were 90.00% and 91.84% with cutoff of Logit (P)=8.16 in ADC+RE group. Moreover, in diagnosis of liver fibrosis S≥3, the AUC was 0. 807, and the sensitivity and specificity were 86.96% and 78.57% with cutoff of ADC=0.53X 10^-3mm^2/s in ADC group. The AUC was 0. 748, and the sensitivity and specificity were 78.26% and 76.79M with cutoff of RE=0.89 in RE group. The AUC was 0. 906, and the sensitivity and specificity were 82.61% and 89.29M with cutoff of Logit(P) =8.73 in ADC+RE group. In addition, the combination of ADC+RE achieved higher sensitiv- ity, specificity and AUC than single ADC or RE besides the hightest sensitivity of ADC in diagnosis

关 键 词:肝纤维化 磁共振成像 扩散加权成像 GD-EOB-DTPA 

分 类 号:R575[医药卫生—消化系统] R445.2[医药卫生—内科学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象