检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]牡丹江医学院附属二院,黑龙江牡丹江157001
出 处:《中医临床研究》2016年第30期67-68,共2页Clinical Journal Of Chinese Medicine
摘 要:目的:探讨在超声接入技术引导下行胆管镜手术治疗胰周脓肿的临床效果。方法:选择2014年5月—2015年10月来我院进行胰周脓肿治疗的患者76例为研究对象,根据治疗方法的不同将患者分为两组,观察组(超声介入技术联合胆管镜治疗)和对照组(超声技术联合引流管治疗),比较两组患者的治疗效果。结果:观察组患者治愈率高,效果明显好于对照组,住院时间短于对照组,术后并发症的发生情况明显少于对照组,差异明显,具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:超声介入技术联合胆管镜治疗胰周脓肿,具有效果明显、安全性高、并发症少的优点,可以明显提高患者的治愈率,值得在临床进行广泛应用。Objective: To explore the clinical effect of ultrasound intervention combined with choledochoscope in the treatment of peripancreatic abscess. Methods: 76 patients with peripancreatic abscess, treated in our hospital from May 2014 to October 2015, were selected as research subjects and divided into the research group (ultrasound intervention combined with choledochoscope treatment) and the control group (ultrasound intervention combined with drainage tube treatment) according to different treatments. The therapeutic effects of two groups were compared. Results: The cure rate and the effect of the research group were significantly better than that of the control group, the hospitalization days of the research group was significantly shorter than that of the control group, the occurrence of postoperative complications of the research group were significantly less than that of the control group, the difference was significant and of statistical significance (P 〈 0.05). Conclusion: Ultrasound intervention combined with choledochoscope had the advantages of significant effect, high safety and less complications in the treatment of peripancreatic abscess, it could improve the cure rate significantly and was worthy of wide clinical application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.236