检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《医学与哲学(A)》2016年第12期13-15,共3页Medicine & Philosophy:Humanistic & Social Medicine Edition
基 金:2014年国家社会科学基金项目;项目编号:14BGL146
摘 要:通过对中国裁判文书网查询的1997年-2015年医疗事故罪判例以及国内外司法适用现状进行分析,可知,医疗纠纷解决途径多元化,医疗事故罪与非罪的界限难以把握,是医疗事故罪适用率低的原因之一。以李建雪案为例进行分析,得出多因一果以及对“严重不负责任”行为的认定影响医疗过失的认定。由此可知,我国医疗事故罪立法上存在缺陷,需要增设罚金刑作为附加刑,出台司法解释对“严重不负责任”进一步认定,对我国医疗事故罪进行立法上的修订和完善提出对策。Through analysis of the cases of the crime of medical accident from 1997 to 2015 in China judgments online and judicial application status at home and abroad, this study found the reasons for the low rate of medical accident crime were the various medical dispute solutions and the difficulties in clarifying the boundaries between crime and non crime of medical accidents. By taking Jianxue Li case as an example, the authors claimed that the identification of the actions of many reasons On cause and "serious irresponsible behavior" had great impact on the identification of medical negligence. Therefore, defects in legislation on the crime of medical accident in China need to add the fine punishment as a supplementary punishment. Also, the judicial interpretation should be introduced to further identify "serious irresponsible behavior". Countermeasures for revising and improving the legislation of medical accident crime in China were put forward.
分 类 号:R-05[医药卫生] D922.16[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117