旅游愉悦体验论的现实和逻辑困境  

The Virtual and Logical Dilemma about the Pleasure Experience of Tourism

作　　者：张补宏[1] 廖梓维 惠章银 

机构地区：[1]华南理工大学经济与贸易学院,广东广州51006

出　　处：《华南理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2016年第6期14-19,共6页Journal of South China University of Technology(Social Science Edition)

摘　　要：本文通过黑色旅游(Dank Tourism)和"灵性旅游(Spiritual Tourism)"两个反例存在,对谢彦君教授的"旅游是以愉悦为目的的异地休闲体验"观点提出质疑,并尝试用存在主义哲学、马斯洛"超越"理论和行为学及"含意本体论"的一些观点对旅游本质做出了解析。研究结果表明,旅游目的体验论和愉悦论是以偏概全的,愉悦体验只能解释旅游早期的或部分的现象。从根本来讲,旅游是人作为"人—社会—自然"关系维之一,对自身存在及其价值进行解释和探寻的一种无限指向性行为。Through the two counter-examples： ＂Dark Tourism＂and ＂Spiritual Tourism＂and with the theories,such as existentialism,transcendentalism of Maslow＇s hierarchy of needs,implicative ontology,this paper questions the viewpoints put forward by Professor XIE Yanjun： ＂Tourism is a off-site leisure experience for the purpose of pleasure＂,and shows that the conclusion of the essence of tourism determined by experience and pleasure is over generalized and imperfect,and the pleasure experience of tourism can only explains the early or partial tourism phenomenon. The essence of tourism is inherently related to the infinite directing behavior seeking the interpretation of self-existence and the exploration of value.

关 键 词：旅游本质 愉悦体验 反例 黑色旅游 灵性旅游 

分 类 号：F592.3[经济管理—旅游管理]