审判中心改革背景下非法证据排除规则的落实与完善——基于2013年来486份刑事判决书的实证考察  

On the Exclusionary Rule in the Concept of Proceedings Centered on Trial: An empirical Study Based on 486 Criminal Cases from 2013

作　　者：张健[1] 

机构地区：[1]江苏大学文法学院,江苏镇江212013

出　　处：《西安电子科技大学学报（社会科学版）》2016年第3期40-46,共7页Journal of Xidian University：Social Science Edition

基　　金：中国法学会2015年度部级法学研究项目<落实非法证据排除法律制度实证研究>;项目批准号:(CLS(2015)Y14)的阶段性研究成果;国家社科基金重大项目"龙泉司法档案整理与研究"(13&ZD151)阶段性成果

摘　　要：完善证据规则是推进以审判为中心诉讼制度改革的关键。通过对审判阶段非法证据排除文本规定与司法实践考察,发现非法排除规则在启动门槛、启动方式、证明标准、庭前会议与排除效果等方面存在司法与立法相背离的严重问题。推进以审判为中心的诉讼改革与落实非法证据排除规则本质上相辅相成。在审判中心改革背景下推进非法证据排除规则落实,应强化侦查、公诉服务审判的意识,实现审判对侦查、公诉的有效制约;构建以保障人权为目的的新型检律协作关系;消解法律治理化的政法传统,为刑事司法场域独立运行提供条件。Perfecting the rule of evidence is the key to Proceed centered on Trial. We found contradictions between the judiciary and the legislation on start threshold, startup mode, the standard of proof, and the effect of pre-trial conference through legislative texts and judicial practice of the exclusionary rule. Proceedings centered on trial and the implementation of the exclusionary rule essentially complement each other. To promote the implementation of the exclusionary rule in the context proceedings centered on trial, we should strengthen the consciousness of investigative and prosecutorial work serving the need of court trial, establish a new type of procuratorial work for the purpose of safeguarding human rights, eliminate the legal tradition of legal governance, and provide conditions for the independent operation of the criminal justice field.

关 键 词：非法证据排除 以审判为中心 证据 证据规则 

分 类 号：D925.113[政治法律—诉讼法学]