合理·缺陷·弥补:基于隐喻映射的中医五行学说研究  

Plausibility·Faultiness·Complement: Study on Five-agent Theory of Traditional Chinese Medicine by Metaphorical Mapping

作　　者：石勇[1] 

机构地区：[1]重庆师范大学外国语学院,重庆400700

出　　处：《中国中医基础医学杂志》2016年第11期1465-1467,共3页JOURNAL OF BASIC CHINESE MEDICINE

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金资助项目(13YJA740038)-<百喻经>寓言故事的隐喻特异性与寓言式隐喻的解读模型

摘　　要：中医五行学说具有隐喻性特征。从隐喻映射角度分析,五行学说与中医学结合虽是实践的抉择,但取象比类发挥了描述性优势,有助于知识的迁移与传承,同时受实体本位思维和过度隐喻推理干扰,常常诱发推导性罅隙,导致中医饱受诘难。通过对中医取象比类深度挖掘,发现过程隐喻与临床检验能够有效地弥合中医五行学说中的罅隙,在张扬触类旁通思维品格的同时,保证取象比类在一个合理、有效的区间内进行。Five-agent Theory of Traditional Chinese Medicine（TCM） is fundamentally metaphorical. Analysis from the perspective of metaphorical mapping theory shows that ＂Image-abstraction, Categorization and Analogy＂（IACA） plays an important role in the description of the combination of Five-agent Theory and TCM, and in the transfer and inheritance of knowledge, though it is characteristic of practice. Meanwhile, with the interference of ontological thinking pattern and excessive reasoning of metaphor, abstraction and analogy tends to induce deductive faultiness, which leads to criticism of TCM. Further research into IACA reveals that process metaphor and test of clinical practice can be conducive to the complement of its deductive faultiness, which can not only urge the good character of analogical thinking style but also ensure the abstraction and analogy is implemented in a reasonable and valid way.

关 键 词：中医五行学说 隐喻映射 中医取象比类 过程隐喻 

分 类 号：R22[医药卫生—中医基础理论]