机构地区:[1]中国医学科学院、北京协和医学院北京协和医院核医学科,100730 [2]中国医学科学院、北京协和医学院北京协和医院病案室,100730 [3]北京大学国际医院肿瘤科
出 处:《中华核医学与分子影像杂志》2016年第6期481-485,共5页Chinese Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
基 金:卫生部行业科研专项项目(201202012);国家自然科学基金(81571714)
摘 要:目的探讨伴桥本甲状腺炎(HT)的非远处转移性中低危PTC患者经低剂量(1 110 MBq)及高剂量(5 550 MBq)131I清除残留甲状腺(简称清甲)治疗的效果。方法2010年7月至2014年12月的140例PTC患者(男16例,女124例;年龄16~66岁)纳入该回顾性研究,其中伴HT组(n=84)根据131I治疗剂量分为伴HT低剂量组(n=56)和伴HT高剂量组(n=28);不伴HT组(n=56)131I治疗剂量均为1 110 MBq。所有患者均在首次131I治疗后6~8个月停服左旋甲状腺素(L-T4),通过诊断性131I全身显像(Dx-WBS)、颈部超声及血清TgAb及sTg检测等评价疗效。以Kruskal-Wallis秩和检验、 χ2检验比较组间临床病理特征(年龄、性别、多灶性、肿瘤大小等)及残留甲状腺(简称残甲)情况,并采用χ2检验比较组间清甲成功率。结果3组患者临床病理特征及术后残甲情况差异无统计学意义(H=0.203~2.944, χ2=0.271~0.970,均P〉0.05)。当以Dx-WBS联合颈部超声评价清甲疗效时,不伴HT组清甲成功率(94.6%,53/56)高于伴HT低剂量组(82.1%,46/56; χ2=4.264,P〈0.05);伴HT高剂量组清甲成功率(85.7%,24/28)略高于低剂量组,但差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.318,P〉0.05)。将上述标准再联合血清sTg评价清甲疗效(未纳入TgAb〉46 kU/L患者)时,不伴HT组清甲成功率(85.7%,48/56)仍高于伴HT低剂量组(75.6%,34/45),但差异无统计学意义(χ2=2.978,P〉0.05);伴HT高剂量组(12/15)与低剂量组清甲成功率差异无统计学意义(χ2=1.320,P〉0.05)。结论伴有HT的非远处转移性中低危PTC患者 131I清甲疗效较不伴HT者差,增加131I治疗剂量未能进一步提高伴HT组患者的清甲成功率。ObjectiveTo evaluate the impact of low-dose 131I therapy and high-dose 131I therapy on the clinical outcome in PTC patients coexisting with Hashimoto′s thyroiditis (HT).MethodsA total of 140 non-distant metastatic PTC patients (16 males, 124 females, age range: 16-66 years) from July 2010 to December 2014 were enrolled in this retrospective study. Patients concurrent with HT (n=84, group A) were divided into low-dose group (1 110 MBq, n=56, group A1) and high-dose group (5 550 MBq, n=28, group A2) according to 131I ablation dose. Patients without HT (n=56) were enrolled as control group (group B), and received 1 110 MBq of 131I. The thyroid remnant ablation outcome was evaluated according to 131I diagnostic whole-body scan (Dx-WBS), neck ultrasonography (US), serum Tg and TgAb level 6-8 months after 131I ablation therapy. The successful ablation rates were compared by χ2 test. Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test was also used.ResultsThere were no significant differences among the 3 groups in terms of both clinicopathological features and postoperative remnant thyroid (H: 0.203-2.944, χ2: 0.271-0.970, all P〉0.05). When negative Dx-WBS and US were deemed as successful ablation criterion, complete ablation rate was found significantly more in group B (94.6%, 53/56) than that in group A1 (82.1%, 46/56; χ2=4.264, P〈0.05), but no significant difference was found between group A2 (85.7%, 24/28) and group A1 (χ2=0.318, P〉0.05). When combining negative sTg (sTg〈1 μg/L, TgAb〈46 kU/L) with the above 2 criterions to assess remnant ablation outcome, group B also had a higher successful rate to achieve complete ablation (85.7%, 48/56) compared with group A1 (75.6%, 34/45), but without statistical significance (χ2=2.978, P〉0.05), and no difference was observed between group A2 (12/15) and group A1 (χ2=1.320, P〉0.05).ConclusionNon-distant metastatic PTC patients coexisting with HT has undesirable 131I ablation outcome compared w
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...