论我国民事检察权的运行方式与功能承担  

On the Operation Modes and Functions of the Civil Procuratorial Power in China

作　　者：杨会新[1] 

机构地区：[1]国家检察官学院

出　　处：《法学家》2016年第6期94-104,共11页The Jurist

基　　金：中国人民大学科研基金研究品牌计划(中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助)"民事纠纷的多元化解决机制研究"(10XNI033)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：抗诉与检察建议是现行法上民事检察权运行的两种方式,民事检察权的功能因运行方式的不同而有不同。抗诉旨在监督审判权,同时通过再审程序发挥着救济当事人的功能,但实际运作中两种功能相互牵制,顾此失彼。只有剔除抗诉的监督功能,将抗诉的功能定位于救济当事人,才能依据当事人主义的要求对抗诉制度加以规制,从根本上保障当事人的私权不受侵犯。而检察建议不受当事人主义的牵绊,也不会侵蚀判决的稳定性及司法裁量权,在监督审判权方面具有天然优势,应通过完善其程序性规定来强化监督效果。The protest and the suggestion are two function modes of the civil procuratorial power.The original purpose of the civil procuratorial protest is to supervise the judicial power,but actually its function is to relieve the party involved by starting the retrial procedure.In practice,eliminating the supervision function of the protest and orientating the function as relief for the parties can regulate the protest system through the adversary system,which fundamentally protects the parties from infringement.The procuratorial suggestion is not stumbled by the adversary system and won't endanger the judgment stability and judicial discretion.It has natural advantage in supervising the judicial power and the dilemma in practice stems from the shortage of the procedure efficacy,which should strengthen the supervision by better procedure provision.

关 键 词：民事检察权 抗诉 检察建议 监督审判权 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学]