论民事抗诉制度新构造与典型民事诉讼的原理相融性  

Principle Compatibility of New Structure of Civil Protest System with Typical Civil Litigation

作　　者：宋小海[1] 

机构地区：[1]浙江省社会科学院法学所

出　　处：《中外法学》2016年第6期1634-1645,共12页Peking University Law Journal

基　　金：作者主持的浙江省哲学社会科学规划课题(课题编号14NDJC216YB)的阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：民事抗诉制度是具有中国特色的民事诉讼制度,学界质疑民事抗诉系检察权"介入"民事诉讼,与传统的以两造当事人平等对席、法官居中裁判的等腰三角形结构为基本样式之典型民事诉讼的原理不相融。从构造层面分析,1991年《民事诉讼法》框架下的民事抗诉制度属于"两阶构造",确实存在前述问题。但经过2007年和2012年《民事诉讼法》的修改,民事抗诉制度形成了全新的"五阶构造",包含了前后相续的双等腰三角形的关系结构。新构造下的民事抗诉制度与再审之诉制度在程序构造和通行原则上遵循同样的原理,表明民事抗诉制度新构造与典型民事诉讼存在着原理相融性。The civil protest system is a Chinese characteristic civil litigation system, but scholars always question that civil protest means procuratorial power intervening civil litigation and it is not compatible in principle with the traditionally typical civil litigation in which two clients equally debate and the judge makes the judgment between them. Analyzed from the structural level, the civil protest system under the framework of the Civil Procedure Law of 1991 was of ＂two--order structure＂, and there is indeed a problem of incompatibility in principle with the typical civil litigation. However, after the amendments to the Civil Procedure Law in 2007 and 2012, civil protest system has been formed a whole new ＂fifth-- order structure＂ including the consecutive structure of double equicrural triangular relation. The civil protest system and the retrial appeal system under the new structure follow the same principle in the procedural structure and universal principle, which shows that the new structure of the civil protest system is compatible in principle with the typical civil litigation.

关 键 词：民事抗诉制度 典型民事诉讼 新构造 原理相融 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学]