CEREC瓷嵌体与树脂充填治疗磨牙Ⅱ类洞的临床疗效  

Clinical evaluation of CEREC all-ceramic inlays and resin restoration of Posterior Teeth Class Ⅱ Cavity

作　　者：张宇秋涵 刘进忠[1] 张朋[1] 

机构地区：[1]郑州大学第一附属医院,郑州大学口腔医学院,450044

出　　处：《实用医学杂志》2016年第23期3853-3855,共3页The Journal of Practical Medicine

基　　金：2010年河南省省院科技合作专项资金项目(编号:102106000016)

摘　　要：目的:通过CEREC系统制作全瓷嵌体与光固化树脂充填修复磨牙Ⅱ类洞短期疗效对比。方法:选取郑州大学第一附属医院2014年全年符合要求的173例患者,184颗后牙,将患者分为两组(A组86例,B组87例),分别进行CEREC瓷嵌体及树脂充填治疗,治疗后进行3、6、12个月随访,采用改良的美国公共健康协会(USPHS)标准进行评估。结果:通过1年随访CEREC组失败率为2.4%,树脂组失败率为10.6%,应用卡方检验分析两种治疗方法的临床成功率差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:CEREC全瓷嵌体是针对后牙牙体Ⅱ类洞修复较为理想的修复方式,有很好临床修复前景。Objective To observe clinical evaluation of Cerec all-ceramic inlays and resin restoration of posterior teeth class Ⅱ cavity. This study may provide a better clinical evidence for patients to choose a more suitable treatment method. Methods According to the experimental requirement from the fourth affiliated hospital of Zhengzhou university ,it selected ninety-nine posterior teeth in eighty-eight cases during 2014. The patients were divited into two groups （group A 86 patients and group B 87 patients） respectively treated CAD/CAM Cerec inlays and resin filling. The inlays were evaluated clinically using modified USPHS criteria at 3,6 months and a year. Results 2（2.4%） CEREC inlays and 9（10.6%） resin restoration reevaluated failure at the a year recall. Conclustions It was satisfactory for posterior teeth Ⅱdefect that all-ceramic inlay was made by CEREC system.

关 键 词：CAD/CAM CEREC瓷嵌体 树脂充填 Ⅱ类洞 

分 类 号：R783[医药卫生—口腔医学]