霍布斯与荀子人性观比较探析  

The Comparative Study of Human Nature by Xunzi and Hobbs

作　　者：黄小珊[1] 赵金科[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东农业大学马克思主义学院,山东泰安271018

出　　处：《西安文理学院学报（社会科学版）》2016年第6期121-124,共4页Journal of Xi’an University(Social Sciences Edition)

摘　　要：人性本质的善恶问题一直是中西方哲学关注的重要问题。霍布斯与荀子虽然身处中西方之文化背景,生活的时代也相差甚远,但二人却是古代东方和近现代西方"性恶论"的典型代表。虽然二者的人性论思想主张有着相同或者类似的出发点、立场与结论,但其人性论的逻辑推演和理论构造、方法与特征、矫治和克服"性恶论"的路径却存在很大的不同。Good and evil of human nature have been an important issue of concern in Western philosophy. Hobbes and Xunzi living in China and Western cultures, the life of the times are quite different, but they are the ancient odental and modern western ＂Evil of＂ typical. Although both Humanity Thought proposition has the same or similar starting point, positions and conclusions, but logical deduction and theoretical constructs its theory of human nature, methods and characteristics, treatment and overcome the ＂evil nature＂ of the path, but there is a great difference. This paper intended to make both the similarities and differences of view of human nature.

关 键 词：性恶论 霍布斯 荀子 

分 类 号：B222.6[哲学宗教—中国哲学]