检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《医学与社会》2016年第12期84-86,90,共4页Medicine and Society
摘 要:目的:探讨父母养育方式对青少年抑郁症患者应付方式的影响。方法:采用父母养育方式评价量表(EBMU)和应付方式问卷(CSQ)分别对100名青少年抑郁症患者和100名健康青少年进行问卷调查。结果:青少年抑郁症患者在父亲情感温暖、理解因子上的得分低于健康青少年,而在父亲惩罚、严厉、拒绝否认、过度保护,母亲拒绝否认、惩罚、严厉因子上的得分高于健康青少年,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。青少年抑郁症患者在解决问题、求助这两种应付方式上的得分低于健康青少年,而自责和退避的得分高于健康青少年,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。解决问题、求助与父亲及母亲情感温暖、理解呈正相关;自责、幻想、退避、合理化与父亲过度保护、母亲过度保护、过分干涉、拒绝否认呈负相关。父母不良养育方式促进了消极应付方式的形成。结论:青少年抑郁症患者的应付方式受父母养育方式的影响,良好的养育方式有利于成熟应付方式的形成。Objective: To study the effect of parental rearing style on coping style of adolescents with depression. Methods: 100 adolescents with depression and 100 healthy adolescents were tested with Egna Minnen Barndoms Uppfostran (EMBU) and Coping Style Questionnaire (CSQ) respectively. Results: (1)The adolescents with depression had lower scores than healthy adolescents in the warmth and understanding of father, and they had higher scores in the punishment, severe and rejection of parents and over protection of father. The difference was statistically significant (P〈0.05). (2)The patients had higher scores in self-blame and avoidance and lower scores in problems solving and seeking help. The difference was statistically significant (P〈0.05). (3)The problems solving and seeking help were positively related to the warmth and understanding of parents. Self-blame, delusion, avoidance and rationalization were negatively related to the over protection of parents, rejection of and over intervention of mother. (4)Parental bad rearing patterns had promoted the formation of negative coping styles. Conclusion: The parental rearing styles influenced coping styles of adolescents with depression. The good parental rearing styles contributed to mature coping styles.
分 类 号:R195.4[医药卫生—卫生统计学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.137.222.228