检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李新功[1] Li Xingong(The Institute of Business Administration of Henan University, Kaifeng 57500)
出 处:《管理评论》2016年第12期54-62,共9页Management Review
基 金:国家哲学与社会科学基金资助项目(12BJL066);河南省软科学重点项目(162400410003)
摘 要:本文基于2000-2013年中国制造业数据,运用面板回归分析方法,从企业R&D投入和创新产出两个方面,研究了政府直接R&D资助和间接R&D资助对企业技术创新的影响。研究发现金融信贷能够增强政府R&D资助效果;政府直接R&D资助和间接R&D资助均能促进技术创新,但效果不同;政府R&D资助对不同规模和不同R&D资金存量的企业效果不同,对行业技术水平没有差异性。对此,本文提出政策建议:改善金融信贷环境提升政府直接R&D资助效果;政府R&D资助应具有针对性;政府间接资助与直接资助应协调并用。Based on the statistical data of Chinese manufacturing industry from 2000 to 2013, this paper employs methods of panel data regression analysis to research the impact of direct government R&D subsidy and indirect government R&D subsidy on technological inno- vation. The results show that direct government R&D subsidy and indirect government R&D subsidy have a significantly positive effect on technological innovation. Financial credit and firm size have a significantly positive moderating effect, while industry technical level has no significantly moderating effect, regardless of promoting direct government R&D subsidy or indirect government R&D subsidy. This pa- per suggests that the financial credit environment should be improved for the government R&D subsidies to play a better role, the govern- ment should aim at specific enterprises when providing subsidies, and both direct and indirect government R&D subsidies should be used for technological innovation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229