检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:姜慧茜 曹真胜[1] 孙浩[1] 胡涵[1] 方宇[1] 胡荣党[1]
机构地区:[1]温州医科大学附属口腔医院.温州医科大学口腔医学研究所正畸科,浙江温州325027
出 处:《上海口腔医学》2016年第6期697-701,共5页Shanghai Journal of Stomatology
基 金:2010年浙江省公益性技术应用研究计划(2010C33124);2014年浙江省自然科学基金(LY14H140008)
摘 要:目的 :分析替牙期上颌唇侧倒置埋伏中切牙治疗结束后切牙的牙周状况。方法 :采用导杆式矫治器联合固定正畸,矫治16例替牙期上颌唇侧倒置埋伏中切牙,在治疗结束约2年后进行随访牙周检查并拍摄锥形束CT(conebeam CT,CBCT)。中切牙分为埋伏牙组和同名牙组,临床检查项目包括菌斑指数(PLI)、牙龈指数(GI)、牙周探诊深度(PD)、附着龈宽度(AW)及临床牙冠长度(CL);应用Mimics16.0系统测量中切牙唇、腭侧牙槽骨高度(ha及fc),唇、腭侧牙槽嵴顶至相应釉-牙骨质界(CEJ)的距离(ab及cd)和牙根唇、腭侧骨支持比例(LBP)、(PBP)及中切牙的唇倾度(U1-SN)。采用SPSS 17.0软件包对数据进行配对t检验。结果:埋伏侧牙组与同名牙组间PLI、GI、PD、U1-SN差异无统计学意义;埋伏组AW、ha、fc、LBP及PBP较小(P<0.01);埋伏组CL、ab及cd较大(P<0.01)。结论:替牙期上颌唇侧倒置埋伏中切牙矫治后牙周支持情况虽较对侧同名牙稍差,牙龈形态不对称,但总体情况良好,无松动,无感染。不对称的牙龈形态提示需后期植骨及牙龈形态修整。PURPOSE: To study the periodontal status of labially inversely impacted maxillary central incisor in mixed dentition after orthodontic treatmenL METHODS: Sixteen patients with labially inversely impacted maxillary central incisor in mixed dentition and treated by guided rod appliance and conventional fixed appliance were enrolled in this study. Periodontal examinations were performed and cone-beam CT (CBCT) was taken approximately 2 years post treatment. Central incisors were divided into impacted and contralateral incisor groups. Clinical examinations included plaque index (PLI), gingival index (G1), probing depth (PD), width of attached gingiva (AW) and clinical crown length (CL); Mimics 16.0 software was used to measure the length of alveolar bone around the root (ha and fc), the length from the alveolar bone crest to cemento- enamel junction(CEJ) (ab and cd) on both the labial and palatal side of the central incisors as well as the labial and palatal bone support proportion (LBP and PBP) of the root and tipping of central incisor (U1-SN). The data were analyzed using paired sample t tests with SPSS 17.0 software package. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in PLI, GI, PD, U1-SN; the value of AW, ha,fc, LBP, PBP was significantly smaller in impacted groups(P〈0.01); the value of CL ab and cd was significantly larger in impacted groups (P〈0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The periodontal status of the impacted central incisor was on good condition without teeth mobility and inflammation, although a little worse than the contralateral homonymous teeth. There may be a need for periodontal bone grafting and gingival surgery in the future for the asymmetric morphology of gingiva.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.90