证券纠纷的仲裁解决——以审判机制为比较  

Arbitration Resolution of the Securities Dispute Compared with Trial Mechanism

作　　者：李盛缘 

机构地区：[1]上海师范大学,上海200234

出　　处：《浙江万里学院学报》2016年第6期38-44,共7页Journal of Zhejiang Wanli University

摘　　要：证券纠纷相较于一般民事纠纷具有社会影响广、案情复杂、国际化趋势等特点。正是由于上述特点,审判机制不能良好地应对证券纠纷。当事人惯常通过向法院起诉解决证券纠纷不能取得满意的救济结果,甚至整个审判机制将呈现败局。仲裁作为非诉争议解决机制,具有民间性、专业性与国际可执行力,通过支持证券仲裁,可以化解这一领域的社会矛盾。并对法院审判机制造成良性竞争,促使其改革与完善。构建适当的证券仲裁制度,需要借助证券行业力量,注重多投资者的保护以及强调仲裁规则的效率。Compared with the general civil disputes, the securities dispute impacts the society more widely. It is also more complicated and has become more and more international in recent years. At the meantime, the trial mechanism failed to response due to those peculiarities. However, the arbitration fits the securities dispute. It is a reasonable route to relief the contradictions. As one of the ADRs, the arbitration has the characteristics of being civil and professional. It is also considered as a worldwide execution. To establish a proper securities arbitration system, industrial strengths is a helping hand as well as focusing on the protection of the investors and the efficiency of arbitration rules.

关 键 词：证券纠纷 证券仲裁 仲裁 FINRA 

分 类 号：D915.7[政治法律—诉讼法学]